From: Scott McNutt <smcnutt@psyent.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:41:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430A0031.9070304@psyent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4309F122.5090907@orkun.us>
Tolunay Orkun wrote:
> The point is you can simply use already available "protect off"
Not to add fuel to the fire ;-) ... but in the past, I did precisely
what Tolunay suggests. I just added a "protect off" to the boot command
to explicitly unprotect specific sectors. It worked just fine -- and
I did not consider the techique to lack convenience.
On-the-other-hand, preventing automatic "UN-protection" in this case
is _policy_ enforcement -- we would be making technical decisions for
others, for applications we know nothing about -- this, I am sure,
is not the u-boot "spirit" that I have observed over the past 5 years.
That being said, a default that does not automatically un-protect
seems appropriate -- or find a way to push the auto un-protect
capability into the board-specific tree.
Regards,
--Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-22 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 4:27 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-19 18:36 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 5:37 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22 6:31 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 7:13 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22 15:37 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 16:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 16:49 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 20:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 16:41 ` Scott McNutt [this message]
2005-08-23 1:53 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22 7:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 17:02 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 20:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 22:05 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 22:46 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-23 7:14 ` Yuli Barcohen
2005-08-23 8:39 ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-23 14:47 ` Brian Waite
2005-08-23 20:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-24 5:58 ` Yuli Barcohen
2005-08-24 16:00 ` Detlev Zundel
2005-08-24 21:52 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-24 23:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-25 14:37 ` Brian Waite
2005-08-25 16:37 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-26 14:12 ` U-Boot policy on flash protection (was [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches) Detlev Zundel
2005-08-26 14:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-02-28 16:34 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-19 18:47 Woodruff, Richard
2005-08-19 20:16 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-19 20:22 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430A0031.9070304@psyent.com \
--to=smcnutt@psyent.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox