[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus

[Steven Scholz]

Hi there,

please apply the attached patch.

Without this patch lowlevel_init.s is _not_ rebuild when board config
file (or other important include files) is changed!

-- 
Steven
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fix_dep.patch
Url: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20050823/aa886b08/attachment.txt 

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <430B385F.6000501@imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
>
> +* Fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
> +  Patch by Steven Scholz, 23 Aug 2005

Added, thanks.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
	-- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus

[Steven Scholz]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <430B385F.6000501@imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
> 
>>+* Fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus
>>+  Patch by Steven Scholz, 23 Aug 2005
> 
> 
> Added, thanks.

Thanks.

Sorry I did not create it git format-patch. I am still not sure how to
use it. Maybe you could add a few lines in your Wiki.

BTW: Was it ok to change the CHANGELOG? You asked for it in your mail
"U-Boot Developer's Information":

	"Make sure to update the CHANGELOG file appropriately."

But I think unless you apply patches immediatly patching CHANGLOG will
always fail. So maybe it's better to have a CHANGELOG entry in the email
body instead of the attached patch ...

--
Steven

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix make dependencies for at91rm9200 and ks8695 cpus

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <430C286F.2040800@imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
> 
> Sorry I did not create it git format-patch. I am still not sure how to
> use it. Maybe you could add a few lines in your Wiki.

This was OK.

> BTW: Was it ok to change the CHANGELOG? You asked for it in your mail

Yes.

> But I think unless you apply patches immediatly patching CHANGLOG will
> always fail. So maybe it's better to have a CHANGELOG entry in the email
> body instead of the attached patch ...

I'm still experimenting with both ways.  Yes,  having  the  CHANGELOG
modified  by the patch will usually cause merge conflicts, but then I
have all information in one file and don't need to jump  between  the
mailer window and my vi session.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Half of the people in the world are below average.