From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Broggini <pbroggini@softool.ch>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:07:52 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: Problem building U-Boot for ARM target
In-Reply-To: <tnxmzlgxj59.fsf@arm.com>
References: <434B830B.4020405@softool.ch> <tnxhdboz6cs.fsf@arm.com>	<434BACC0.4090708@softool.ch> <tnx4q7oz0av.fsf@arm.com>	<434BBC9A.2020904@softool.ch> <tnxmzlgxj59.fsf@arm.com>
Message-ID: <434BC738.1020707@softool.ch>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Catalin Marinas ha scritto:
> Paolo Broggini <pbroggini@softool.ch> wrote:
> 
>>  1) PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mapcs-32,-mabi=apcs-gnu)
>>     -> gcc complains about '-mabi=apcs-gnu' (see my original mail)
>>
>>  2) PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-g,-mabi=apcs-gnu)
>>     -> everything compiles fine, the option used is '-g'
>>
>>  3) PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mapcs-32,-g)
>>     -> everything compiles fine, the option used is '-mapcs-32'
> 
> 
>I don't see why 1 and 3 checks return
> different options.
Indeed!

Well may be it starts to become out-of-topics here in U-Boot list, but
just one more thing:
I tried the macro cc-option "by hand" (so without $CFLAGS) in a bash shell and I got
the same results as above, i.e. the check for option -mapcs-32 fails but the compiler
support it and indeed the compilation works fine! May be a bug?

Thanks

-P.Broggini