[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/5] New board support: Nokia RX-51 aka N900

["Ивайло Димитров" <freemangordon@abv.bg>]

 Hi Marek,

as part of the code is written by me I will answer to a couple of the questions


 >Dear Pali Roh?r,
 >
 >> Based on previous work by: Alistair Buxton 
 >> 
 >> Signed-off-by: Pali Roh?r 
 >> Cc: ?????? ???????? 
 >
 >Can we please stick to ASCII instead of UTF8?
 >
 >Cc: Ivaylo Dimitrov (if I'm not mistaken)

You are not :). And if it comes to me, it does not matter whether cyrillic or latin will be used.

 >> +}
 >> +
 >> +static void omap3_emu_romcode_call(u32 service_id, u32 *parameters)
 >> +{
 >> +	u32 i, num_params = *parameters;
 >> +	u32 *sram_scratch_space = (u32 *)OMAP3_PUBLIC_SRAM_SCRATCH_AREA;
 >> +
 >> +	/*
 >> +	 * copy the parameters to an un-cached area to avoid coherency
 >> +	 * issues
 >> +	 */
 >
 >_WHAT_ ?!
 >
 >Use dcache_flush(). The Omap3 rom won't cope with cache memory? Actually -- why 
 >do you even do call into ROM ?
 >
 >> +	for (i = 0; i < num_params; i++) {
 >> +		__raw_writel(*parameters, sram_scratch_space);
 >> +		parameters++;
 >> +		sram_scratch_space++;
 >> +	}
 >> +
 >> +	/* Now make the PPA call */
 >> +	do_omap3_emu_romcode_call(service_id, OMAP3_PUBLIC_SRAM_SCRATCH_AREA);
 >> +}
 >> +

That part of the code is ported from existing code in u-boot:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c;h=9cee1d9b490692d02129d98470ba7b57b8e61ce2;hb=HEAD#l373

So I can't think of a reason to do it in a different way.

The ROM call is needed to enable workaround for ARM errata 430973. RX-51 being a high secure device does not allow writes to AUX control register outside of the secure world. So, this call is needed to enable IBE bit in AUXCR. I can elaborate more if needed.

 >> +	 * Cortex-A8(r1p0..r1p2) errata 430973 workaround
 >> +	 * Set IBE bit in Auxiliary Control Register
 >> +	 */
 >> +	omap3_update_aux_cr_secure_rx51(1 << 6, 0);
 >> +
 >> +	return 0;
 >> +}
 >> +
 >

And here is the code where IBE bit (bit 6) set.

Have in mind there is a difference re how parameters are passed compared to beagleboard for example, RX-51 ROM expects first parameter to be the number of remaining parameters+1, while beagleboard(again, just an example) ROM expects only the number of the remaining parameters, so existing function in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/board.c cannot be called (even if it is not declared static).