* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
@ 2005-11-10 3:10 Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 3:18 ` Sam Song
2005-11-10 7:59 ` Eckart Goehler
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Wang @ 2005-11-10 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi wd,
Yeah, I've read relevant topics in DULG and then revised my
configuration header file as following:
#define CONFIG_ETHADDR 00:50:c2:1e:af:fb
#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
#define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.123.100
#define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.123.115
#define CONFIG_BOOTFILE "zImage"
#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "tftpboot\; go 0c480000"
#define CFG_LOAD_ADDR 0x0c480000
I'm running Fedora Core 4 on my PC. I've got the tftp-server rpm
installed, iptables turned off, tftp service enabled and xinetd
restarted, zImage copied under the /tftpboot/ directory. But after 5 sec
boot delay the TFTP seemed to time out like this:
TFTP from server 192.168.123.115; out IP is 192.168.123.100
Filename: 'zImage'
Load address: 0xc480000
Loading: T T # # T # T T (omitted)
Retry count exceeded; starting again
Then I interrupted the command and tried to ping my PC:
jx44b0>ping 192.168.123.115
host 192.168.123.115 is alive
I think the network condition is OK, but the TFTP always times out. I
want to configure a longer timeout value for TFTP but don't know where.
Waiting for your reply. Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
Zhen Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 3:10 [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out? Zhen Wang
@ 2005-11-10 3:18 ` Sam Song
2005-11-10 4:19 ` Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 7:59 ` Eckart Goehler
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sam Song @ 2005-11-10 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Zhen Wang <mailtojarod@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the network condition is OK, but the TFTP
> always times out. I
Try to see if use a direct net line. Perhaps it' the
busy load on local network made it.
Regards,
Sam
___________________________________________________________
????G???????????????????
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 3:18 ` Sam Song
@ 2005-11-10 4:19 ` Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 4:37 ` Bharathi Subramanian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Wang @ 2005-11-10 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Sam Song wrote:
> Zhen Wang <mailtojarod@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I think the network condition is OK, but the TFTP
>>always times out. I
>
>
> Try to see if use a direct net line. Perhaps it' the
> busy load on local network made it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sam
>
>
But the board is connected to my PC directly through a twisted cable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 4:19 ` Zhen Wang
@ 2005-11-10 4:37 ` Bharathi Subramanian
2005-11-10 6:12 ` Zhen Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bharathi Subramanian @ 2005-11-10 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Zhen Wang wrote:
> >> I think the network condition is OK, but the TFTP always times
> >> out.
> But the board is connected to my PC directly through a twisted cable.
1. Then TFTP is not properly configured OR not running.
2. Restart the xinetd and try (if it is GNU/Linux Env)
3. Try tftp from another PC, if that works, then try from the board.
Bye :)
--
Bharathi S
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 4:37 ` Bharathi Subramanian
@ 2005-11-10 6:12 ` Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 8:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Wang @ 2005-11-10 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Bharathi Subramanian Wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Zhen Wang wrote:
>
>
>>>>I think the network condition is OK, but the TFTP always times
>>>>out.
>
>
>>But the board is connected to my PC directly through a twisted cable.
>
>
> 1. Then TFTP is not properly configured OR not running.
> 2. Restart the xinetd and try (if it is GNU/Linux Env)
> 3. Try tftp from another PC, if that works, then try from the board.
>
> Bye :)
I did check out my tftp server configurations carefully after
read your reply.
1. I am running Fedora Core 4 on my PC and installed
tftp-server-0.40-6.i386.rpm. I did check out it by typing 'rpm -q
tftp-server'.
2. I turned on tftp service and turned off iptables service, and
configured no firewall.
3. I restarted xinetd successfully by typing 'service xinted restart'.
4. After typing 'netstat -a|grep tftp' I could see the output 'udp 0 0
*:tftp *:*'.
5. The /tftpboot directory's permission was 'drwxr-xr-x'.
6. I could tftp zImage successfully from another PC running Win XP over
the Ethernet but still timed out from my board.
In a word, I think I should revise the tftpboot relevant codes to
prolong the time before time out. But I don't the exact file(location).
Best regards,
Zhen Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 3:10 [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out? Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 3:18 ` Sam Song
@ 2005-11-10 7:59 ` Eckart Goehler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Eckart Goehler @ 2005-11-10 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
Zhen Wang wrote:
>
> Hi wd,
> Yeah, I've read relevant topics in DULG and then revised my
> configuration header file as following:
>
> #define CONFIG_ETHADDR 00:50:c2:1e:af:fb
> #define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
> #define CONFIG_IPADDR 192.168.123.100
> #define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.123.115
> #define CONFIG_BOOTFILE "zImage"
> #define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "tftpboot\; go 0c480000"
> #define CFG_LOAD_ADDR 0x0c480000
>
> I'm running Fedora Core 4 on my PC. I've got the tftp-server rpm
> installed, iptables turned off, tftp service enabled and xinetd
> restarted, zImage copied under the /tftpboot/ directory. But after 5 sec
> boot delay the TFTP seemed to time out like this:
>
> TFTP from server 192.168.123.115; out IP is 192.168.123.100
> Filename: 'zImage'
> Load address: 0xc480000
> Loading: T T # # T # T T (omitted)
> Retry count exceeded; starting again
>
> Then I interrupted the command and tried to ping my PC:
>
> jx44b0>ping 192.168.123.115
> host 192.168.123.115 is alive
That looks rather like a server problem (possibly firewall). You should
try to run tftp from either the server itself, or - better - from a
separate computer. Actually I faced same problems on a RedHat machine
till xinietd was set up properly.
regards
eckart
>
> I think the network condition is OK, but the TFTP always times out. I
> want to configure a longer timeout value for TFTP but don't know where.
> Waiting for your reply. Thanks a lot.
>
> Best regards,
> Zhen Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 6:12 ` Zhen Wang
@ 2005-11-10 8:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2005-11-10 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <4372E4BF.8020401@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> In a word, I think I should revise the tftpboot relevant codes to
> prolong the time before time out. But I don't the exact file(location).
No. This will NOT solve the problem.
Run a network sniffer to find out if U-Boot is actually sending
packets, and the TFTP server fails to reply, or if U-Boot does not
send any packets at all.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
365 Days of drinking Lo-Cal beer. = 1 Lite-year
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
@ 2005-11-10 9:23 André Berggren
2005-11-10 13:40 ` Jerry Van Baren
2005-11-11 6:18 ` Zhen Wang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: André Berggren @ 2005-11-10 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi!
We have the same problem with one minor difference. U-boot get the first part of a file and then starts getting timeouts (TTTT).
We used a Etheral to sniff and found out that u-boot ack one datapackage but when the next datapackage araives u-boot doesn?t seem to hear it. Instead u-boot timesout listening and sends another ack on the previous datapackage. The tftp server then retransmits the last datapackage again witch u-boot doesn?t hear, u-boot times out and send another ack on the previous datapackage, and we are stuck in this loop.
We use a Moxa ED6008 switch where we attached the sniffer for the recording.
See appended ethereal capture-file. Mark one UDP-package and use Analyse->decode as and chose tftp to make it more readable.
//Andr?
-----Original Message-----
From: u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Wolfgang Denk
Sent: Thu 11/10/2005 9:42 AM
To: Zhen Wang
Cc: Bharathi Subramanian; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Re : [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
In message <4372E4BF.8020401@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> In a word, I think I should revise the tftpboot relevant codes to
> prolong the time before time out. But I don't the exact file(location).
No. This will NOT solve the problem.
Run a network sniffer to find out if U-Boot is actually sending
packets, and the TFTP server fails to reply, or if U-Boot does not
send any packets at all.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
365 Days of drinking Lo-Cal beer. = 1 Lite-year
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tftp.cap
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5706 bytes
Desc: tftp.cap
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20051110/6587d0f7/attachment.obj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 9:23 André Berggren
@ 2005-11-10 13:40 ` Jerry Van Baren
2005-11-10 15:12 ` NZG
2005-11-11 6:18 ` Zhen Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2005-11-10 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
A: What really annoys Wolfgang?
Q: HTML (and I bet you thought I was going to say top posting ;-).
</humor>
"but when the next datapackage araives u-boot doesn?t seem to hear it"
I'm thinking the above quote is almost correct. "Doesn't process it" is
probably the correct statement. It sounds like your u-boot build has
problems receiving ethernet packets after a while. This could be many
things, but is almost undoubtedly a software problem and increasing
timeouts won't fix it, it will just ACK previous packets longer.
I would check packet handling. My first suspicion is that your receive
packet handling isn't handling the packet queue properly. An example of
this would be if two packets are received but you only handle one of
them and never go on to the next - as long as you only receive one
packet per poll, you are OK, but if you receive two you get stuck.
gvb
Andr? Berggren wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have the same problem with one minor difference. U-boot get the
> first part of a file and then starts getting timeouts (TTTT).
> We used a Etheral to sniff and found out that u-boot ack one
> datapackage but when the next datapackage araives u-boot doesn?t seem
> to hear it. Instead u-boot timesout listening and sends another ack
> on the previous datapackage. The tftp server then retransmits the
> last datapackage again witch u-boot doesn?t hear, u-boot times out
> and send another ack on the previous datapackage, and we are stuck in
> this loop.
> We use a Moxa ED6008 switch where we attached the sniffer for the
recording.
>
> See appended ethereal capture-file. Mark one UDP-package and use
> Analyse->decode as and chose tftp to make it more readable.
>
> //Andr?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Wolfgang Denk
> Sent: Thu 11/10/2005 9:42 AM
> To: Zhen Wang
> Cc: Bharathi Subramanian; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: Re : [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
>
> In message <4372E4BF.8020401@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
>> In a word, I think I should revise the tftpboot relevant codes to
>>prolong the time before time out. But I don't the exact file(location).
>
>
> No. This will NOT solve the problem.
>
> Run a network sniffer to find out if U-Boot is actually sending
> packets, and the TFTP server fails to reply, or if U-Boot does not
> send any packets at all.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 13:40 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2005-11-10 15:12 ` NZG
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: NZG @ 2005-11-10 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In developing the Coldfire 5282 port we use for our SoM-5282EM, I had a very
similar problem.
It took awhile to track down, but turned out to me an imperfect timer
implementation.
The timer is used to generate required network delays and timeouts, and if it
is not implemented properly, you will see just this.
That is, short network transaction will work fine, but long ones, my crash and
continually restart.
I would do some investigation into your timer,
The first step would be to make sure sleep works correctly.
NZG.
On Thursday 10 November 2005 7:40 am, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> A: What really annoys Wolfgang?
> Q: HTML (and I bet you thought I was going to say top posting ;-).
>
> </humor>
>
> "but when the next datapackage araives u-boot doesn?t seem to hear it"
>
> I'm thinking the above quote is almost correct. "Doesn't process it" is
> probably the correct statement. It sounds like your u-boot build has
> problems receiving ethernet packets after a while. This could be many
> things, but is almost undoubtedly a software problem and increasing
> timeouts won't fix it, it will just ACK previous packets longer.
>
> I would check packet handling. My first suspicion is that your receive
> packet handling isn't handling the packet queue properly. An example of
> this would be if two packets are received but you only handle one of
> them and never go on to the next - as long as you only receive one
> packet per poll, you are OK, but if you receive two you get stuck.
>
> gvb
>
> Andr? Berggren wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We have the same problem with one minor difference. U-boot get the
> > first part of a file and then starts getting timeouts (TTTT).
> > We used a Etheral to sniff and found out that u-boot ack one
> > datapackage but when the next datapackage araives u-boot doesn?t seem
> > to hear it. Instead u-boot timesout listening and sends another ack
> > on the previous datapackage. The tftp server then retransmits the
> > last datapackage again witch u-boot doesn?t hear, u-boot times out
> > and send another ack on the previous datapackage, and we are stuck in
> > this loop.
> > We use a Moxa ED6008 switch where we attached the sniffer for the
>
> recording.
>
> > See appended ethereal capture-file. Mark one UDP-package and use
> > Analyse->decode as and chose tftp to make it more readable.
> >
> > //Andr?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Wolfgang Denk
> > Sent: Thu 11/10/2005 9:42 AM
> > To: Zhen Wang
> > Cc: Bharathi Subramanian; u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: Re : [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
> >
> > In message <4372E4BF.8020401@gmail.com> you wrote:
> >> In a word, I think I should revise the tftpboot relevant codes to
> >>prolong the time before time out. But I don't the exact file(location).
> >
> > No. This will NOT solve the problem.
> >
> > Run a network sniffer to find out if U-Boot is actually sending
> > packets, and the TFTP server fails to reply, or if U-Boot does not
> > send any packets at all.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wolfgang Denk
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
> Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
> own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-10 9:23 André Berggren
2005-11-10 13:40 ` Jerry Van Baren
@ 2005-11-11 6:18 ` Zhen Wang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Zhen Wang @ 2005-11-11 6:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Andr? Berggren Wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have the same problem with one minor difference. U-boot get the first part of a file and then starts getting timeouts (TTTT).
> We used a Etheral to sniff and found out that u-boot ack one datapackage but when the next datapackage araives u-boot doesn?t seem to hear it. Instead u-boot timesout listening and sends another ack on the previous datapackage. The tftp server then retransmits the last datapackage again witch u-boot doesn?t hear, u-boot times out and send another ack on the previous datapackage, and we are stuck in this loop.
> We use a Moxa ED6008 switch where we attached the sniffer for the recording.
>
> See appended ethereal capture-file. Mark one UDP-package and use Analyse->decode as and chose tftp to make it more readable.
>
> //Andr?
>
>
Thanks a lot! I've downloaded Ethereal v0.10.13 and learned to use it
last night. In order to find some problems I built u-boot with several
different configurations and then I sniffed TFTP traffic between my
board and PC utilizing Ethereal. Then I could figure a table as following:
filename CFG_HZ TIMEOUT TIMEOUT_COUNT block #
------------------------------------------------------------------------
u-boot-tftp0.bin 1000 5(s) 10 231
u-boot-tftp2.bin 1000 100(s) 270 4179
u-boot-tftp3.bin 1000 100(s) 400 4260
u-boot-tftp4.bin 1000 5(s) 400 4260
CFG_HZ is a configuration _SETTING_ in my board's configuration
header file(I don't know its exact function till now). TIMEOUT and
TIMEOUT_COUNT both are constants defined in net/tftp.c.
I've got a 2130KB(i.e. 4260 TFTP packages) uClinux zImage to download
over the twisted cable which connected my board with my PC directly.
The numbers in last column of above table indicate the last TFTP
block id received from the TFTP server(PC) before giving up(i.e. retry
count beyonds TIMEOUT_COUNT). Therefore 4260 indicates a complete download.
According to the table, TIMEOUT doesn't seem to be a critical part in
unsuccessful downloads. Though I can use a large TIMEOUT_COUNT to
accomplish the download, it's a bad solution. Now my first suspicion is
that the timing without interrupts scheme implemented in
cpu/s3c44b0/interrupts.c.
Best regards,
Zhen Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
@ 2005-11-11 8:49 Martin Krause
2005-11-11 9:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Martin Krause @ 2005-11-11 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hie Zhen,
Zhen Wang wrote on Friday, November 11, 2005 7:18 AM:
> CFG_HZ is a configuration _SETTING_ in my board's configuration
> header file(I don't know its exact function till now). TIMEOUT and
CFG_HZ defines the number of timer ticks per second. The function
get_timer() returns the current vaule of the internal timer tick
counter (with the variable name: 'timestamp'). The following code
snippet should delay for exat one second:
...
tmo = get_timer(0) + 1 * CFG_HZ;
while (get_timer(0) < tmo);
> TIMEOUT_COUNT both are constants defined in net/tftp.c.
> I've got a 2130KB(i.e. 4260 TFTP packages) uClinux zImage to
> download
> over the twisted cable which connected my board with my PC directly.
> The numbers in last column of above table indicate the last TFTP
> block id received from the TFTP server(PC) before giving up(i.e. retry
> count beyonds TIMEOUT_COUNT). Therefore 4260 indicates a complete
> download. According to the table, TIMEOUT doesn't seem to be a
> critical part in
> unsuccessful downloads. Though I can use a large TIMEOUT_COUNT to
> accomplish the download, it's a bad solution. Now my first suspicion
> is
> that the timing without interrupts scheme implemented in
> cpu/s3c44b0/interrupts.c.
There actually seems to be a bug. CFG_HZ is set to 1000 on your board.
This means in one second the counter returned by get_timer() should
increase by 1000. But this doesn't correspond to the implementation
of udelay() on your board (from cpu/s3c44b0/interrupts.c):
void udelay (unsigned long usec)
{
ulong tmo;
tmo = usec / 1000;
tmo *= CFG_HZ;
tmo /= 8;
tmo += get_timer (0);
while (get_timer_masked () < tmo)
/*NOP*/;
}
This assumes that the internal counter increases by 8 in one second.
Since CFG_HZ should be 1000 (according to Wolfgang Denk) I suggest
to fix the TIMER_LOAD_VAL on your board, so that one underrun
of timer TCNT01 accours every 1 ms.
Regards,
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out?
2005-11-11 8:49 Martin Krause
@ 2005-11-11 9:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2005-11-11 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <47F3F98010FF784EBEE6526EAAB078D1C05E8D@tq-mailsrv.tq-net.de> you wrote:
>
> CFG_HZ defines the number of timer ticks per second. The function
> get_timer() returns the current vaule of the internal timer tick
> counter (with the variable name: 'timestamp'). The following code
> snippet should delay for exat one second:
>
> ...
> tmo = get_timer(0) + 1 * CFG_HZ;
> while (get_timer(0) < tmo);
Warning. This code will NOT work when there is a wrap-around.
> There actually seems to be a bug. CFG_HZ is set to 1000 on your board.
This setting is the correct value. It was a mistake of mine to name
this CFG_* and give users the idea this could be changed.
> This means in one second the counter returned by get_timer() should
> increase by 1000. But this doesn't correspond to the implementation
> of udelay() on your board (from cpu/s3c44b0/interrupts.c):
>
> void udelay (unsigned long usec)
> {
> ulong tmo;
>
> tmo = usec / 1000;
> tmo *= CFG_HZ;
> tmo /= 8;
>
> tmo += get_timer (0);
>
> while (get_timer_masked () < tmo)
> /*NOP*/;
> }
Indeed. This implementetion is seriously broken.
It will also result in totally unexpected delays in case of
wrap-around (there are more broken implementations like this in the
existing U-Boot code; maintainers should take care).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
-- Spock, "And The Children Shall Lead", stardate 5029.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-11 9:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-10 3:10 [U-Boot-Users] TFTP times out? Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 3:18 ` Sam Song
2005-11-10 4:19 ` Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 4:37 ` Bharathi Subramanian
2005-11-10 6:12 ` Zhen Wang
2005-11-10 8:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-11-10 7:59 ` Eckart Goehler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-10 9:23 André Berggren
2005-11-10 13:40 ` Jerry Van Baren
2005-11-10 15:12 ` NZG
2005-11-11 6:18 ` Zhen Wang
2005-11-11 8:49 Martin Krause
2005-11-11 9:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox