From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:32:11 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH][BUGFIX] Incorrect handling of AT91RM9200
 timer overflow
In-Reply-To: <fc.004c4e48003a7993004c4e48003a7993.3a79ba@rea.de>
References: <fc.004c4e48003a7993004c4e48003a7993.3a79ba@rea.de>
Message-ID: <4382E59B.4090702@imc-berlin.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang,

> the AT91RM9200 timer functions are confusing apples with bananas.
> 
> When the (16-bit) timer overflows, we have lost exactly 2^16 counts
> (or a multiple thereof, but we currently can't catch that situation),
> but get_timer_raw() instead adds the (unrelated) conversion factor
> to milliseconds, causing udelay() to potentially return too early.
> 
> The patch below fixes this.
> 
> Cheers
>  Anders
> 
> CHANGELOG:
>   Fix incorrect handling of at91rm9200 timer overflow in get_timer_raw()
>   Patch by Anders Larsen, 11 Nov 2005
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <alarsen@rea.de>

Makes sense. Please apply.

--
Steven