From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tolunay Orkun Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:58:33 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: Problem with the cfi flash driver with ax8/x16 flash configuredinx8 mode. In-Reply-To: <1137155357.43c79d1db02da@webmail.televes.com:443> References: <51DB8827D393D411BB69003048003F4601B1C284@tvesntr> <43C766C4.4030302@aotek.es> <1137155357.43c79d1db02da@webmail.televes.com:443> Message-ID: <43C82289.3060608@orkun.us> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Alex BASTOS wrote: > > I think, at the end, it will be Wolfgang or Tolunay Orkun > who will choose. Not me. It is Wolfgang that decides what is acceptable. I might have argued my position a bit more passionately in the past as well regarding some changes but I do not have any such decision making capability here. I have interest in this peace of code because we use it and I have submitted some patches and studied the code probably a little more closely than others. I am all for someone picking up all the pending patches and merging in. I wish I could do this but I really do not have time at this time. I guess this is true for most of us nowadays. I am looking at "cfi_testing" branch proposal from Wolfgang as a medium to incorporate all the pending patches and resolve the merge conflicts between various patches before we can sync back to the mainline. Since a lot of people are now dependent on these patches (as evidenced by frequency of questions regarding cfi_flash.c driver on the list) there is a lot of good to come if we merge these "somewhere" and after a testing period of say 1 month if everyone is happy (and especially Wolfgang) we can merge back to mainline hopefully before next release of U-Boot. Wolfgang what do you think? Best regards, Tolunay