public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: llandre <r&d2@dave-tech.it>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:35:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <443A8940.3050102@dave-tech.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427722615.20060410170041@varma-el.com>

> Pros:
>      BDI - 10Mbit eth, Lauterbach - 100 Mbit.
>      Lauterbach scalable and simply extendable, BDI - not.
1) Powerful scripting language
2) Very user friendly
3) Rich commands set that allows to debug hardware problems, too
4) Can "interpret" peripheral registers to provide human 
readable/changeable values
5) O.S. awarness for several o.s. and RTOSes
6) Modularity (trace module, logic analyzer module)


> Cons:
>      BDI support gnu toolchain natively (in GDB server mode),
>      Lauterbach - not (sometime it parsing elf/dwarf correctly,
>      sometime, usually in critical cases :), not).
>      And you are know, hmm, strange Lauterbach price policy:
>      price of BDI firmware for a new CPU target is approx. 1000 eur,
>      for the Lauterbach - price of new device.

1) So far no gdb support
2) USB version doesn't support Linux on host

-- 
llandre

DAVE Electronics System House - R&D Department
web:   http://www.dave-tech.it
email: r&d2 at dave-tech.it

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-10 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32   ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17     ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38       ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04         ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11  6:06     ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35   ` llandre [this message]
2006-04-10 17:58     ` [U-Boot-Users] " Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48       ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10         ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41     ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12  7:54       ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07         ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13  6:17           ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13  6:43             ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00   ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 18:20     ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04       ` Andrey Volkov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=443A8940.3050102@dave-tech.it \
    --to=r&d2@dave-tech.it \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox