From: Marco Cavallini <arm.linux@koansoftware.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:00:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <443A8F3B.7050005@koansoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427722615.20060410170041@varma-el.com>
> Pros:
> BDI - 10Mbit eth, Lauterbach - 100 Mbit.
> Lauterbach scalable and simply extendable, BDI - not.
Lauterbach is the best choiche for both Linux and WinCE targets.
Lauterbach have *excellent* support too.
> Cons:
> BDI support gnu toolchain natively (in GDB server mode),
> Lauterbach - not (sometime it parsing elf/dwarf correctly,
> sometime, usually in critical cases :), not).
> And you are know, hmm, strange Lauterbach price policy:
> price of BDI firmware for a new CPU target is approx. 1000 eur,
> for the Lauterbach - price of new device.
--
Marco Cavallini
==============================================================
Koan s.a.s. - Software Engineering
Linux and WinCE solutions for Embedded and Real-Time Software
Klinux : the embedded distribution for industrial applications
- Atmel AT91 ARM Third Party Consultant
- Intel PCA Developer Network Member
- Microsoft Windows Embedded Partner
Via Pascoli, 3 - 24121 Bergamo - ITALIA
http://www.koansoftware.com - http://www.klinux.org
==============================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 12:38 [U-Boot-Users] BDI vs. Lauterbach David Snowdon
2006-04-10 13:00 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 15:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 16:17 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 16:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 18:04 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 6:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Wolfram Wadepohl
2006-04-10 16:35 ` [U-Boot-Users] " llandre
2006-04-10 17:58 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-10 19:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-10 22:10 ` Andrey Volkov
2006-04-11 10:41 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-04-12 7:54 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-12 10:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-04-13 6:17 ` David Snowdon
2006-04-13 6:43 ` Marco Cavallini
2006-04-10 17:00 ` Marco Cavallini [this message]
2006-04-10 18:20 ` Frank
2006-04-10 22:04 ` Andrey Volkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-10 13:02 Woodruff, Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=443A8F3B.7050005@koansoftware.com \
--to=arm.linux@koansoftware.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox