* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix incorrect comment in flash.h
@ 2006-05-22 8:52 Andreas Engel
2006-05-23 7:09 ` Tolunay Orkun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Engel @ 2006-05-22 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
CHANGELOG:
* fix incorrect comment for SST320/SST640 chips
Patch by Andreas Engel, 22 May 2006
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sst.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 941 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060522/c4a00d18/attachment.bin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix incorrect comment in flash.h
2006-05-22 8:52 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix incorrect comment in flash.h Andreas Engel
@ 2006-05-23 7:09 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-05-23 8:19 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Andreas Engel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tolunay Orkun @ 2006-05-23 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Andreas Engel wrote:
> CHANGELOG:
>
> * fix incorrect comment for SST320/SST640 chips
> Patch by Andreas Engel, 22 May 2006
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> fixed wrong comment with SST320/SST640 chips
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Engel <andreas.engel@marconi.com>
>
> diff --git a/include/flash.h b/include/flash.h
> index a84dc68..94c7ff8 100644
> --- a/include/flash.h
> +++ b/include/flash.h
> @@ -341,8 +341,8 @@ #define FLASH_SST200A 0x0040 /* SST 39x
> #define FLASH_SST400A 0x0042 /* SST 39xF400A ID ( 4M = 256K x 16 ) */
> #define FLASH_SST800A 0x0044 /* SST 39xF800A ID ( 8M = 512K x 16 ) */
> #define FLASH_SST160A 0x0046 /* SST 39xF160A ID ( 16M = 1M x 16 ) */
> -#define FLASH_SST320 0x0048 /* SST 39xF160A ID ( 16M = 1M x 16 ) */
> -#define FLASH_SST640 0x004A /* SST 39xF160A ID ( 16M = 1M x 16 ) */
> +#define FLASH_SST320 0x0048 /* SST 39xF160A ID ( 32M = 2M x 16 ) */
> +#define FLASH_SST640 0x004A /* SST 39xF160A ID ( 64M = 4M x 16 ) */
> #define FLASH_SST040 0x000E /* SST 39xF040 ID (512KB = 4Mbit x 8 ) */
>
> #define FLASH_STM800AB 0x0051 /* STM M29WF800AB ( 8M = 512K x 16 ) */
Does SST640 and SST320 have the same ID as SST160A. The comment says:
SST39xF160A ID for all 3 of these even in your corrected patch...
Best regards,
Tolunay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH] fix incorrect comment in flash.h
2006-05-23 7:09 ` Tolunay Orkun
@ 2006-05-23 8:19 ` Andreas Engel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Engel @ 2006-05-23 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Tolunay Orkun wrote:
> Does SST640 and SST320 have the same ID as SST160A. The comment says:
> SST39xF160A ID for all 3 of these even in your corrected patch...
You're right, of course. They don't have the same id. Here's an updated
patch.
CHANGELOG:
* fix incorrect comment for SST320/SST640 chips
Patch by Andreas Engel, 23 May 2006
Thanks,
Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sst.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 942 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060523/0a94275c/attachment.bin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-23 8:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-22 8:52 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fix incorrect comment in flash.h Andreas Engel
2006-05-23 7:09 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-05-23 8:19 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Andreas Engel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox