From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Engel Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:19:24 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH] fix incorrect comment in flash.h In-Reply-To: <4472B537.9030802@orkun.us> References: <44717BCD.80805@marconi.com> <4472B537.9030802@orkun.us> Message-ID: <4472C58C.4090901@marconi.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Tolunay Orkun wrote: > Does SST640 and SST320 have the same ID as SST160A. The comment says: > SST39xF160A ID for all 3 of these even in your corrected patch... You're right, of course. They don't have the same id. Here's an updated patch. CHANGELOG: * fix incorrect comment for SST320/SST640 chips Patch by Andreas Engel, 23 May 2006 Thanks, Andreas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: sst.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 942 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060523/0a94275c/attachment.bin