From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tolunay Orkun <listmember@orkun.us>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:22:06 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] skipping bad blocks when erasing nand
In-Reply-To: <003a01c6a9e9$f371bf70$a134800a@RudiDell>
References: <003a01c6a9e9$f371bf70$a134800a@RudiDell>
Message-ID: <44C0101E.1090505@orkun.us>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

David Byron wrote:
> On Friday, July 14th, Wolfgang Denk wrote:	 
> 
>> I tend to agree here, which was the reason that I said I was  willing
>> to  accept  the patch, but that at least the printf() shoould be kept
>> so that the user gets the warning.
> 
> Sorry for the delay.  Here's a patch that lets the erase continue, but does
> print a message.

Instead of printing a message for each block, I think it would be neater 
to give a summary at the end like:

x blocks erased successfully. y blocks ignored.

nand bad command gives the list anyway if someone is more inclined to 
find out what blocks.

What do you (and Wolfgang) think about my proposal?

Tolunay