[U-Boot-Users] Based on x86 build out u-boot image up to 1G!! Help!!

[U-Boot-Users] Based on x86 build out u-boot image up to 1G!! Help!!

[李皓]

Hi, all!

         I am trying to build u-boot on sc520_cdp board. I have read all
missives about sc520_cdp board, but still can?t solve my problem on HUGE
size of u-boot.bin. After reading Mr. Jon Loeliger?s missive about _Why
objdump Creates 4G U-Boot Images_, I know how to check the reason of u-boot.
bin?s size. But after reading u-boot.lds in board/sc520_cdp/, I feel that I
cannot change the mapping addresses, such as TEXT_BASE= 0x387c0000, and
.bios 0 : AT ( LOADADDR(.realmode) + SIZEOF(.realmode) ) { *(.bios) }.

         According to Mr. Jon Loeliger?s missive, text section?s
address(0x387c0000) and .bios section?s address(around 0) result in the
huge size of u-boot.bin. But I know because after start up computer it is
realmode in x86, .bios section should be mapped to low address. So I feel in
dilemma right now. What should I do? Guys out there who have built out
u-boot.bin based on x86 successfully please help me! Detailed information
will be nice.

 
David_leeh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060829/e4150977/attachment.htm 

[U-Boot-Users] Based on x86 build out u-boot image up to 1G!! Help!!

[David Updegraff]

??

Try a variation of this.  I too have scars still from sc520... -;)

And feel free to ping me back offline about sc520.

> Hi, all!
> 
>          I am trying to build u-boot on sc520_cdp board. I have read all 
> missives about sc520_cdp board, but still can?t solve my problem on HUGE 
> size of u-boot.bin. After reading Mr. Jon Loeliger?s missive about _Why 
> objdump Creates 4G U-Boot Images_, I know how to check the reason of 
> u-boot.bin?s size. But after reading u-boot.lds in board/sc520_cdp/, I 
> feel that I cannot change the mapping addresses, such as TEXT_BASE= 
> 0x387c0000, and .bios 0 : AT ( LOADADDR(.realmode) + SIZEOF(.realmode) ) 
> { *(.bios) }.
> 
>          According to Mr. Jon Loeliger?s missive, text section?s 
> address(0x387c0000) and .bios section?s address(around 0) result in the 
> huge size of u-boot.bin. But I know because after start up computer it 
> is realmode in x86, .bios section should be mapped to low address. So I 
> feel in dilemma right now. What should I do? Guys out there who have 
> built out u-boot.bin based on x86 successfully please help me! Detailed 
> information will be nice.
> 
>                                                                                                                                                      
> David_leeh
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: u-boot.lds
Url: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20060829/670e52e1/attachment.txt