From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:50:12 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Define upmconfig() for 834x systems In-Reply-To: <20060908223226.79375353AD0@atlas.denx.de> References: <20060908223226.79375353AD0@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: <4501F3A4.3060108@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > If you intend to use this with any future patches, then please submit > your patches in an order that makes some sense. Well, I have a dilemma then. This upmconfig() patch is generic for all 834x systems. It may not be currently used by the 8349EMDS, but it will be used by the upcoming 8349EMITX patch I'm working on. Without the new upmconfig(), the ITX code won't compile. And yet, the patch is not specific to the ITX. That's why I sent it out today. So you're saying I should send it out as part of my ITX patch, even though it's not ITX-specific? > Also, please follow the Coding Style requirements (trailing white > space). Sorry, I keep thinking I've covered everything in the coding style, but something always slips through. -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale