From: Tolunay Orkun <listmember@orkun.us>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Adding new commands
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:45:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4533EF84.4020608@orkun.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061016200628.E6AC6353DB7@atlas.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <453368A1.5050407@dave-tech.it> you wrote:
>> I have to add two new commands so I have to add something like this to
>> cmd_confdefs.h:
>>
>> #define CFG_CMD_NEW1 0x8000000000000000ULL
>> #define CFG_CMD_NEW2 ???
>>
>> IIUC we have 64 bits available for the commands and 63 commands are
>> already defined. So how to define more than 64 commands?
>
> We have to rework this whole configuration setup. At the moment I
> don't have a good and quick solution available.
>
One possibility is to get rid of existing bitmap scheme. A
cmd_defaults.h would define all default CFG_COMMAND_XXX. And board
configs would add remove commands by defining more or remove from
defaults by undefining the corresponding macros after the inclusion of
cmd_defaults.h.
Another quick solution would be to use Most Significant Bit as an
expansion flag and use up to 63 more commands via CONFIG_COMMANDS2 macro.
The test logic will need to be modified but it could be wrapped to a
macro like:
Instead of this:
#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_DATE) || defined(CONFIG_TIMESTAMP)
#include <rtc.h>
#endif
Use this:
#if IS_CONFIG_COMMAND(CFG_CMD_DATE) || defined(CONFIG_TIMESTAMP)
#include <rtc.h>
#endif
And IS_CONFIG_COMMAND macro defined something like:
#define IS_CONFIG_COMMAND(x) ((x) & 0x8000000000000000ULL) ? \
((x) & CONFIG_COMMANDS2) | \
((x) & CONFIG_COMMANDS))
And if we get to 63+62=126 commands we can use next to MSB in
CONFIG_COMMANDS2 as another expansion bit along with CONFIG_COMMANDS3
(if we ever get that far).
Actually we do not even need to modify the existing (CONFIG_COMMAND &
....) but any new configuration options needs to test for enabling via
the new macro.
Best regards,
Tolunay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-16 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-16 11:10 [U-Boot-Users] Adding new commands llandre
2006-10-16 11:48 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-10-16 18:09 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2006-10-16 20:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-10-16 20:24 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2006-10-16 21:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-10-16 20:45 ` Tolunay Orkun [this message]
2006-10-17 7:19 ` llandre
2006-10-17 9:57 ` Brent Cook
2006-10-17 10:35 ` llandre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4533EF84.4020608@orkun.us \
--to=listmember@orkun.us \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox