public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tolunay Orkun <listmember@orkun.us>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Adding new commands
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:45:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4533EF84.4020608@orkun.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061016200628.E6AC6353DB7@atlas.denx.de>



Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <453368A1.5050407@dave-tech.it> you wrote:
>> I have to add two new commands so I have to add something like this to 
>> cmd_confdefs.h:
>>
>> #define CFG_CMD_NEW1 0x8000000000000000ULL
>> #define CFG_CMD_NEW2 ???
>>
>> IIUC we have 64 bits available for the commands and 63 commands are 
>> already defined. So how to define more than 64 commands?
> 
> We have to rework this whole configuration setup.  At  the  moment  I
> don't have a good and quick solution available.
> 

One possibility is to get rid of existing bitmap scheme. A 
cmd_defaults.h would define all default CFG_COMMAND_XXX. And board 
configs would add remove commands by defining more or remove from 
defaults by undefining the corresponding macros after the inclusion of 
cmd_defaults.h.

Another quick solution would be to use Most Significant Bit as an 
expansion flag and use up to 63 more commands via CONFIG_COMMANDS2 macro.

The test logic will need to be modified but it could be wrapped to a 
macro like:

Instead of this:

#if (CONFIG_COMMANDS & CFG_CMD_DATE) || defined(CONFIG_TIMESTAMP)
#include <rtc.h>
#endif

Use this:

#if IS_CONFIG_COMMAND(CFG_CMD_DATE) || defined(CONFIG_TIMESTAMP)
#include <rtc.h>
#endif

And IS_CONFIG_COMMAND macro defined something like:

#define IS_CONFIG_COMMAND(x)	((x) & 0x8000000000000000ULL) ? \
				((x) & CONFIG_COMMANDS2) | \
				((x) & CONFIG_COMMANDS))

And if we get to 63+62=126 commands we can use next to MSB in 
CONFIG_COMMANDS2 as another expansion bit along with CONFIG_COMMANDS3 
(if we ever get that far).

Actually we do not even need to modify the existing (CONFIG_COMMAND & 
....) but any new configuration options needs to test for enabling via 
the new macro.

Best regards,
Tolunay

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-16 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16 11:10 [U-Boot-Users] Adding new commands llandre
2006-10-16 11:48 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2006-10-16 18:09   ` Ulf Samuelsson
2006-10-16 20:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-10-16 20:24   ` Ulf Samuelsson
2006-10-16 21:19     ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-10-16 20:45   ` Tolunay Orkun [this message]
2006-10-17  7:19   ` llandre
2006-10-17  9:57     ` Brent Cook
2006-10-17 10:35       ` llandre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4533EF84.4020608@orkun.us \
    --to=listmember@orkun.us \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox