From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Sector size with CFI driver?
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:00:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4547AB63.8090802@freescale.com> (raw)
When using the CFI driver, how is the sector size determined?
The reason I ask is that I have two different versions of U-Boot for my board,
both developed in-house. One version is based on 1.1.3, and the other on
1.1.5. The 1.1.5 version cannot erase/program the last sector on the first
flash bank. Also, the 1.1.3 says this when I do flinfo:
Bank # 1: CFI conformant FLASH (16 x 16) Size: 8 MB in 135 Sectors
Erase timeout 16384 ms, write timeout 1 ms, buffer write timeout 1 ms,
buffer size 1
Sector Start Addresses:
FE000000 FE002000 FE004000 FE006000 FE008000
FE00A000 FE00C000 FE00E000 FE010000 FE020000
And the 1.1.5 version says:
Bank # 1: CFI compatible FLASH (16 port width with 16 chip width)
Command set is AMD/Fujitsu standard. Driver is polling DQ6 for status checking.
Size: 8 MB in 135 Sectors
Erase timeout 16384 ms, write timeout 0 ms, buffer write timeout 1 ms,
buffer size 1
Sector Start Addresses:
FE000000 FE010000 FE020000 FE030000 FE040000
FE050000 FE060000 FE070000 FE080000 FE090000
As you can see the sector sizes are different, but everything else is the same.
Both versions have this:
#define CFG_FLASH_CFI
#define CFG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER
#define CFG_FLASH_BASE 0xFE000000
#define CFG_FLASH_SIZE 16
#define CFG_MAX_FLASH_BANKS 2
#define CFG_MAX_FLASH_SECT 135
so I can't figure out why one works and the other doesn't.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-31 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-31 20:00 Timur Tabi [this message]
2006-10-31 20:53 ` [U-Boot-Users] Sector size with CFI driver? Tolunay Orkun
2006-10-31 21:40 ` Timur Tabi
2006-10-31 21:59 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-10-31 23:08 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 13:05 ` Stefan Roese
2006-11-01 16:34 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 16:44 ` Ben Warren
2006-11-01 16:58 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 17:02 ` Stefan Roese
2006-11-01 17:08 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 17:41 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-11-01 17:52 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 17:47 ` Tolunay Orkun
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-01 17:47 Yogi
2006-11-01 18:29 Yogi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4547AB63.8090802@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox