From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Sector size with CFI driver?
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:08:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4548D496.3090605@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611011803.46043.sr@denx.de>
Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 November 2006 17:58, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Timur Tabi wrote:
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MPC8349ITX
>>> + for (i = num_erase_regions-1; i >= 0; i--) { /* top
>>> boot */ +#else
>>> for (i = 0; i < num_erase_regions; i++) {
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>> Ok, I put the above change into cfi_flash.c, and now it works! Can someone
>> explain to me why? Does U-Boot not normally support "top boot" flash? If
>> so, is there a better way of doing this?
>
> Seems like your FLASH doesn't really support the CFI "Device Geometry
> Definition". Both versions (top & bottom boot block) most likely report the
> same layout.
Assuming this is true (and I will try to find out), can you recommend how you
want me to implement a fix for my board? Should I do something like
#define CFG_CFI_DEV_GEO_BROKEN
in my board header file, and then do something like:
+#ifdef CFG_CFI_DEV_GEO_BROKEN
+ for (i = num_erase_regions-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+#else
for (i = 0; i < num_erase_regions; i++) {
+#endif
This is really ugly, I know, but I need help coming up with a method that you
guys will accept.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-01 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-31 20:00 [U-Boot-Users] Sector size with CFI driver? Timur Tabi
2006-10-31 20:53 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-10-31 21:40 ` Timur Tabi
2006-10-31 21:59 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-10-31 23:08 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 13:05 ` Stefan Roese
2006-11-01 16:34 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 16:44 ` Ben Warren
2006-11-01 16:58 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 17:02 ` Stefan Roese
2006-11-01 17:08 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2006-11-01 17:41 ` Tolunay Orkun
2006-11-01 17:52 ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-01 17:47 ` Tolunay Orkun
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-01 17:47 Yogi
2006-11-01 18:29 Yogi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4548D496.3090605@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox