public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] bd_info vs. global_data
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:15:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4553E0C4.4010207@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061110002911.B12C23535D2@atlas.denx.de>

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Yes, but IIRC also contains information that is noit available in gd,
> and I don't want to extend gd if it can be avoided, a this  is  taken
> from very scarce resources.

Is the bd located immediately after the gd in memory?

>> bd->xxx and other code that uses gd->xxx, with no real consistence.  I think 
> 
> Actually, in most cases it makes some sense if you think longer about
> it. But I agree, it's not nice.

How about a rule that any function can write to bd_info (to initialize its 
contents), but only the do_bootm_xxx functions can read from it, and only to 
prepare it for passing to Linux.  This would eliminate code like this:

#define OF_TBCLK		(bd->bi_busfreq / 4)

and hopefully stuff like this:

	if ((s = getenv ("clocks_in_mhz")) != NULL) {
		/* convert all clock information to MHz */
		kbd->bi_intfreq /= 1000000L;
		kbd->bi_busfreq /= 1000000L;
#if defined(CONFIG_MPC8220)
	kbd->bi_inpfreq /= 1000000L;
	kbd->bi_pcifreq /= 1000000L;
	kbd->bi_pevfreq /= 1000000L;
	kbd->bi_flbfreq /= 1000000L;
	kbd->bi_vcofreq /= 1000000L;
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_CPM2)
		kbd->bi_cpmfreq /= 1000000L;
		kbd->bi_brgfreq /= 1000000L;
		kbd->bi_sccfreq /= 1000000L;
		kbd->bi_vco     /= 1000000L;
#endif

In this case, I don't understand the clocks_in_mhz environment variable.  Is 
this something that we really want to be run-time configurable?

>> the bd_info structure should be local to cmd_bootm.c, and should be allocated 
>> and initialized only if we're booting a non-OF version of Linux.  This would 
>> eliminate using bd-> for anything other than booting non-OF Linux.
>>
>> Comments?
> 
> Did you try to implement this?

No, it's just something that occurred to me today while trying to resolve the 
OF_TBCLK problem.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-10  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-09 23:13 [U-Boot-Users] bd_info vs. global_data Timur Tabi
2006-11-10  0:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-11-10  2:15   ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2006-11-10 14:33     ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-11-10 16:38       ` Timur Tabi
2006-11-10 23:03         ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4553E0C4.4010207@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox