From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:56:13 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-83xx.git (I2C rework) In-Reply-To: References: <456C7A18.1090309@freescale.com> <1164737878.31193.38.camel@saruman.qstreams.net> Message-ID: <456C945D.90705@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > In the same note, definitely, definitely there are designs with multiple > I2C buses. Just because something does not exist on an evaluation board, > it doesn't mean it's not used in the real world. The new fsl_i2c.c supports multiple HW I2C buses. Well, it supports only 2 buses, but I have plans to fix that. > So please make sure that both HW I2C & SW I2C can coexist. I'm going to need some help with that. All I'm hearing so far are comments that the two should work together. I don't see how any of the I2C changes I made affect soft I2C. On top of that, I've never used soft I2C, so I don't even know how it's supposed to work. -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale