From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot allocating PCI I/O space from 0 (Was: pata_sl82c105 can not reserve IO region)
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:36:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45718F55.4080903@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165011583.22108.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hello.
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>I don't think that is the problem. pci_request_regions() handles all
>>this internally. It is incorrect for me to not request BAR 5
>>if present as nobody else should use that resource with my driver loaded.
>>The underlying problem appears to be that PPC64 isn't setting up the
>>resources properly (at least as viewed by the pci core code). If a
>>resource is not set up then pci_request_resource() correctly handles
>>it .. except on PPC64. You have a resource at zero with a length and
>>type. PPC64 is not reporting to the upper layers that the resource was
>>not allocated. It is reporting that the resource *was* allocated, and at a
>>bogus address of zero.
>>If you trust the firmware that is fine, but you need to report the truth,
>>at which point pci_request_resources() will work correctly.
> We don't have a choice but to trust the firmware on those machines. We
> can't assign things ourselves on most of them for various reasons (in
> many cases, the hypervisor won't let us).
> So you suggest that I clear resource->flags in that case ?
> I think part of the problem is a firmware bug in that the firmware data
> actually decodes to BAR 5 is assigned to address 0 ... I suppose we can
> consider that address 0 is never valid on those machines and consider
> that as unassigned but it's a bit dodgy.. Or maybe a PCI quirk in the
> pSeries code would be best.
Well, I'm having a very related issue with the U-Boot on MPC85xx: recently
I've noticed that it started allocating PCI I/O space from 0 (while the older
versions started from 0x1000). The IDE core can't tolerate this, giving me
such messages on bootup:
PDC20269: inconsistent baseregs (BIOS) for port 0, skipping
when I have Promise Ultra133TX2 card inserted into PCI alone. I've looked thru
the U-Boot sources and commit history but failed to locate the change that led
to this...
WBR, Sergei
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-02 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061130165202.GA23205@aepfle.de>
[not found] ` <20061130171049.7b80a40c@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20061130184748.GA24071@aepfle.de>
[not found] ` <20061201183355.GA9701@aepfle.de>
[not found] ` <45707CF8.3090106@ru.mvista.com>
[not found] ` <1165010029.22108.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20061201221525.7a741062@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1165011583.22108.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2006-12-02 14:36 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2006-12-02 16:33 ` [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot allocating PCI I/O space from 0 (Was: pata_sl82c105 can not reserve IO region) Sergei Shtylyov
2006-12-26 20:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45718F55.4080903@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox