From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:36:35 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.
In-Reply-To: <45750057.3030400@orkun.us>
References: <20061204230937.24117353CAE@atlas.denx.de>	<4574AD27.2080001@freescale.com>
	<CF30C9C8-91A6-4A6F-9F08-F1DB3885002C@kernel.crashing.org>
	<4574C7B3.6010607@orkun.us>
	<172EAD69-405B-45B7-833B-0CDD5662B19A@kernel.crashing.org>
	<45750057.3030400@orkun.us>
Message-ID: <4575A013.2080500@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Tolunay Orkun wrote:

> What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to 
> CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the 
> CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of). 

I agree with Kumar.  We should not defined CONFIG_MPC8349 anywhere until we know 
we need it.  Technically speaking, with the possible exception of errata, there 
should never be a need for CONFIG_MPC8349.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale