From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:44:04 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.
In-Reply-To: <E7593982-8064-4D57-A8D8-83262D2522BA@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <20061205165711.8DD75352604@atlas.denx.de>
	<E7593982-8064-4D57-A8D8-83262D2522BA@kernel.crashing.org>
Message-ID: <4575AFE4.2020108@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Kumar Gala wrote:

> If the intent is for 'documentation' how about doing:
> 
> #define CONFIG_MPC8349    ##
> 
> So that if someone uses CONFIG_MPC8349 you can a compile error.

Eh, I don't like that.

I don't think Wolfgang meant to limit CONFIG_MPC8349 to just documentation 
purposes.  Your idea would require all the board header files to change if 
8349-specific is ever introduced.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale