From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 83xx: Put the version (and magic) after the HRCW.
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:38:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4579DB68.1010506@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4579DAC1.3080804@smiths-aerospace.com>
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> I suspect your 8349E-mITX is configured to "boothigh" (BMS = 1, also
> known as HRCWH_FROM_0XFFF00100) so the u-boot image starts at 0xFFF00000
> rather than at the start of flash (nominally 0xFE000000). In this case
> you should find the magic and version string starting at 0xFFF00040. Of
> course, in the .bin/.srec/whatever file, it should be at offset 0x40.
Yes, that's correct.
> That is one of the advantages of "bootlow" - the HRCW from u-boot is
> placed at the start of flash and thus is used. With "boothigh" , the
> HRCW that is part of u-boot is in the "wrong place" and thus is not
> used. (Another advantage of "bootlow" is that you don't have to
> dedicate 1MB of flash for the u-boot image.)
The original code from our BSP had only boothigh, so that's how I left it. I
guess I should test lowboot as an option.
> Looking at include/configs/MPC8349ITX.h, if PCI_64BIT is defined it does
> a lowboot, otherwise it does a highboot (which seems odd to me, but
> people tell me I'm odd and the world is normal).
I've noticed that too, and I'm trying to get answer as to why.
> The "lowboot" patch is specific to the MPC8360EMDS, although it could be
> copy and pasted into the MPC8349ITX configuration easily enough.
Ok, if it gets accepted, I'll port it to the 8349ITX.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-08 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 2:23 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 83xx: Put the version (and magic) after the HRCW Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-07 2:55 ` Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-07 3:16 ` [U-Boot-Users] Re: " Sam Song
2006-12-07 3:45 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-08 2:49 ` Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-08 16:33 ` Timur Tabi
2006-12-08 16:50 ` Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-08 21:13 ` Timur Tabi
2006-12-08 21:36 ` Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-08 21:38 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-07 8:32 Joakim Tjernlund
2006-12-07 13:22 ` Jerry Van Baren
2006-12-07 17:05 Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4579DB68.1010506@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox