From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:31:56 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] CFG_LOAD_ADDR vs. CONFIG_LOADADDR vs.
	CFG_TFTP_LOADADDR
In-Reply-To: <20070110231914.2E7B535264F@atlas.denx.de>
References: <20070110231914.2E7B535264F@atlas.denx.de>
Message-ID: <45A5776C.9060409@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk wrote:

>> What's the difference between CFG_LOAD_ADDR and CONFIG_LOADADDR?  Looking at the 
> 
> One underscore, a 'O', a 'N', and a 'I' ;-)

Otto Waalkes could take lessons from you.

> CFG_LOAD_ADDR is what you are supposed to use in the code.
> 
> CONFIG_LOADADDR is the value used to initialize the "loadaddr"
> variable in the default environment.
> 
>> code, it looks like their both used as default load addresses, but I don't see 
>> why they should have different values (they do in most header files).
> 
> I see little reason to define CONFIG_LOADADDR at all.

Then what's the best way to define a default value for the "loadaddr" variable?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale