From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Hobi <dhobi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:16:14 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] RFC:new multi image format
In-Reply-To: <D87DF9BC-1392-42F1-8642-D3D9D80D646E@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <D87DF9BC-1392-42F1-8642-D3D9D80D646E@kernel.crashing.org>
Message-ID: <45FEB74E.5020106@gmx.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 13.03.2007 03:59, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The current multi image format doesn't really provide any information
> about what the images contained inside the multi image are.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Are other fields useful or should we just duplicate the image_header
> completely?

If the fields of the current image header suffice to describe the images 
contained in a multi-image, you can just wrap each sub-image with a 
image header. That is, first create a number of (single-image) uImages, 
then create a multi-image out of these uImages.

Best Regards,
Daniel