From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:39:17 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix memory initialization on MPC8349ITX
In-Reply-To: <CF7E46FCFF66AD478BB72724345289EC27961A@twx-exch01.twacs.local>
References: <CF7E46FCFF66AD478BB72724345289EC27960B@twx-exch01.twacs.local>
	<462FD4B3.6080901@freescale.com> <462FDC3C.8050102@freescale.com>
	<CF7E46FCFF66AD478BB72724345289EC279619@twx-exch01.twacs.local>
	<4630B84C.6070406@freescale.com>
	<CF7E46FCFF66AD478BB72724345289EC27961A@twx-exch01.twacs.local>
Message-ID: <4630B995.3020505@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Benedict, Michael wrote:

> I have a revision 1.0 board here (I think... The silkscreen in the
> middle of the board reads "MPC8349E-mITX REV1.0").  Is there any chance
> the revision can explain the disparity in behavior?

They all say "REV 1.0".  I was talking about the CPU.  I have two 1.0 boards, one with a 
rev 1.1 CPU and another with a rev 3.1 CPU.  You can tell via the U-Boot CPU: line:

CPU: MPC8349E, Rev: 31 at 533.333 MHz

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale