[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[Bühn, Oliver]

Dear U-Boot users!
 
My name is Oliver B?hn and I'm a new U-Boot user.
 
During the past few days I'm trying to get a selfcompiled U-Boot running on our at91sam9260ek board with ST NAND256W3A, which didn't work so far.
 
I guess there are still some misconfigurations.
 
Question: Where do I find the doc for all the thousands of config variables like AT91C_SM_TDF and so forth?
Where do I find an explanation of what ECC is?
 
Helpful hints a very much appreciated.
 
 Oliver.
 


This message (including any attachments) contains confidential 
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.  
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may 
constitute a violation of law.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to 
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system.  If you 
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender 
immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20070427/a133c89a/attachment.htm 

[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <A454554758E5484AA9F3B3FCDFF512278E3CA0@dhreinsvxb01.messaging.danaherad.com> you wrote:
> 
> My name is Oliver B?hn and I'm a new U-Boot user.

Willkommen an Bord!

> Question: Where do I find the doc for all the thousands of config
> variables like AT91C_SM_TDF and so forth?

Grep the source tree.

> Where do I find an explanation of what ECC is?

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fehlerkorrekturverfahren

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office:  Kirchenstr. 5,       D-82194 Groebenzell,            Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Veni, Vidi, VISA:
        I came, I saw, I did a little shopping.

[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

On 4/27/07, B?hn, Oliver <OBuehn@raytek.de> wrote:
> Question: Where do I find the doc for all the thousands of config variables
> like AT91C_SM_TDF and so forth?

If I'm not completely mistaken, those are hardware register
definitions, not config variables. So the data sheet for at91sam9260
is probably the best place to find documentation for it.

>  This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>  and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.

Hmm. You are aware that you're posting this to a public mailing list, right? ;-)

Haavard

[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[Robin Gilks]

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On 4/27/07, B?hn, Oliver <OBuehn@raytek.de> wrote:
> 
>>  This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>>  and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
> 
> Hmm. You are aware that you're posting this to a public mailing list, right? ;-)

I keep seeing comments like this - I'm sure that my IT dept will stick 
something similar onto this email - but the intended recipient *IS* the 
mailing list so thats all right then isn't it? It sure beats pratting 
about with a gmail account to protect just a few peoples sensibilities...

-- 
Robin

=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
 altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================

[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

On 4/29/07, Robin Gilks <robin.gilks@tait.co.nz> wrote:
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > On 4/27/07, B?hn, Oliver <OBuehn@raytek.de> wrote:
> >
> >>  This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> >>  and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
> >
> > Hmm. You are aware that you're posting this to a public mailing list, right? ;-)
>
> I keep seeing comments like this - I'm sure that my IT dept will stick
> something similar onto this email - but the intended recipient *IS* the
> mailing list so thats all right then isn't it? It sure beats pratting
> about with a gmail account to protect just a few peoples sensibilities...

Yeah, but it _is_ pretty strange to post confidential information on a
public mailing list, isn't it? What happens if you really _did_ post
something you didn't mean to -- will the disclaimer actually mean a
damn thing as long as it's being attached to _all_ emails no matter
whether they're confidential or not?

Anyway, I didn't really mean to critizise anyone here. Although I
think such disclaimers are just plain stupid, complaining about it on
u-boot-users certainly isn't going to change anything. And the next
thing that happens is probably that my own IT department does the same
thing...

Btw, I use a gmail account mostly for convenience -- I was having some
problems with my VPN setup some time ago, so I subscribed to
u-boot-users and linux-kernel with my gmail account to ensure that I
could reply to u-boot and Linux mail from home. I try to send
important stuff like patches and pull requests from my Atmel address,
but that might change if they decide to put stupid disclaimers on all
my e-mails...I can't seriously submit patches that are "confidential"
for inclusion in a GPL'd project, can I?

Haavard

[U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

[Bühn, Oliver]

Well, the message I sent was indeed highly confidential and not to be read by anyone.

;->

I didn't even know that this diclaimer was attached to my mail. When reading that mail in my out-folder, I don't see it. It's therefore attached somwhere between my machine and the mail gateway (or there). It's not been attached to a message to myself.

Good to have this discussed.

 Oliver.
 

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] Im Auftrag von Haavard Skinnemoen
Gesendet: Montag, 30. April 2007 00:15
An: robin.gilks at tait.co.nz
Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [U-Boot-Users] doc for config options?

On 4/29/07, Robin Gilks <robin.gilks@tait.co.nz> wrote:
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > On 4/27/07, B?hn, Oliver <OBuehn@raytek.de> wrote:
> >
> >>  This message (including any attachments) contains confidential  
> >> and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
> >
> > Hmm. You are aware that you're posting this to a public mailing 
> > list, right? ;-)
>
> I keep seeing comments like this - I'm sure that my IT dept will stick 
> something similar onto this email - but the intended recipient *IS* 
> the mailing list so thats all right then isn't it? It sure beats 
> pratting about with a gmail account to protect just a few peoples sensibilities...

Yeah, but it _is_ pretty strange to post confidential information on a public mailing list, isn't it? What happens if you really _did_ post something you didn't mean to -- will the disclaimer actually mean a damn thing as long as it's being attached to _all_ emails no matter whether they're confidential or not?

Anyway, I didn't really mean to critizise anyone here. Although I think such disclaimers are just plain stupid, complaining about it on u-boot-users certainly isn't going to change anything. And the next thing that happens is probably that my own IT department does the same thing...

Btw, I use a gmail account mostly for convenience -- I was having some problems with my VPN setup some time ago, so I subscribed to u-boot-users and linux-kernel with my gmail account to ensure that I could reply to u-boot and Linux mail from home. I try to send important stuff like patches and pull requests from my Atmel address, but that might change if they decide to put stupid disclaimers on all my e-mails...I can't seriously submit patches that are "confidential"
for inclusion in a GPL'd project, can I?

Haavard

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential 
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.  
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may 
constitute a violation of law.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to 
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system.  If you 
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender 
immediately.