From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:48:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464DBCB4.3050409@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464DBBB2.1060006@grandegger.com>
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> I think fdt_checkboard() (or boardcheck) should be run from inside the
>> fdt_open_into() command. This takes advantage of the existing
>> mechanism of fdt_open_into() to return an error. It also allows for a
>> device tree to be opened after U-Boot has booted.
>
> But it's too late for initial initialization (before RAM is available).
Just make it so that fdt_open_into() is called early:
checkboard,
INIT_FUNC_WATCHDOG_INIT
#if defined(CFG_FDT_ADDR_FLASH)
init_fdt,
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_MISC_INIT_F)
misc_init_f,
#endif
INIT_FUNC_WATCHDOG_RESET
#if defined(CONFIG_HARD_I2C) || defined(CONFIG_SOFT_I2C)
init_func_i2c,
#endif
and init_fdt() calls fdt_open_into().
> Using the FDT directly from ROM is not recommended because access might
> be slow, but we likely need it for early initialization.
I don't access speed is important for the reading the FDT, especially flash vs. RAM. It's
not that much slower.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-18 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 9:09 [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 14:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:48 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-05-18 15:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 19:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 15:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 15:35 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:05 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 16:12 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:30 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 8:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-20 9:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-20 12:39 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 13:05 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 16:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 17:02 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 17:18 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-21 18:31 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 19:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 17:26 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 19:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 19:39 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 15:23 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 17:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 19:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 19:26 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-18 19:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464DBCB4.3050409@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox