From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:20:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464DC450.8040205@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464DBFC8.4050708@freescale.com>
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
>> RAM is _not_ available at that stage.
>
> Do we really need RAM to parse the device tree and configure U-Boot? I
> think not.
But you need it anyhow in RAM for booting Linux. Why not doing it early,
e.g. after relocation when memory is available.
> The device tree has a memory section:
>
> memory {
> device_type = "memory";
> reg = <00000000 10000000>; // 256MB
> };
>
> So the question is: do we want U-Boot to use this node to determine how
> much RAM there is, or do we want U-Boot to determine how much RAM there
> is and update this node?
Both makes sense, I think. How we finally use FDT it U-Boot is not yet
clear, but exhaustive usage like in the kernel seems not attractive to
me. Currently I just need it do enable some devices dynamically, like
PCMCIA, RTC and CAN and configure the LCD controller for various panels.
>> Depends, you might be right for FLASH on a 32-bit bus. On slow ROM
>> devices and slow processors, it matters.
>
> I still don't see how it's important. If the device tree is on slow
> memory, so what? You have to read it sooner or later. If your board
> can't handle this feature, then don't enable it, and configure U-Boot
> the "old fashioned way".
Don't like the "don't care" argument. If you can make your code faster,
just do it.
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-18 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 9:09 [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 14:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:48 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2007-05-18 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 19:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 15:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 15:35 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:05 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 16:12 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:30 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 8:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-20 9:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-20 12:39 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 13:05 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 16:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 17:02 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 17:18 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-21 18:31 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 19:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 17:26 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 19:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 19:39 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 15:23 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 17:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 19:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 19:26 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-18 19:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464DC450.8040205@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox