public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:02:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4651D0B9.9080000@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4651CF98.30107@grandegger.com>

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>
>>> Then something similar to the ENV could be chosen:
>>>
>>>   CFG_FDT_ADDR
>>>   CFG_FDT_IS_IN_FLASH
>>>   CFG_FDT_IS_IN_xxx
>>
>> We need two addresses:
>>
>> 1) The address where the FDT is stored when the system is powered up
> 
> OK.
> 
>> 2) The address in RAM where the FDT should be placed before Linux is 
>> booted.
> 
> This should be some kind of default address. 

Any default address is most likely board-specific.  It would be nice if U-Boot could 
determine the best address automatically when possible.

> Also be aware, that the 
> blob can be within a uImage created with mkimage. Then the load address 
> defined in the uImage should be used.

Yes.

> You might be right. The _IS_IN_ is used for the ENV, I have to check 
> what the rational behind it is (if there is one at all).

It's handy if you want to use the same macro to represent different types of addresses. 
Personally, I don't see much value in that.  I would rather that a particular macro be 
used to represent only one kind of value.  When I see CFG_FDT_ADDR_RAM, I know that the 
value is a virtual address that the CPU can dereference at any time.

> I'm not sure if you understand the intended purpose. The address of the 
> _initial_ blob could be stored in the env variable "fdtaddr" to select 
> _one_ blob out of many in the FLASH.

Hmm....

I can see value in that, but then that variable can contain completely different addresses 
depending on the type of storage, which I don't like.  Plus, I would rather that we use 
macro commands to set the FDT address, rather than an environment variable.  This gives us 
more flexibility.

> I tend to leave it up to the board specific code where and how to verify 
> the FDT. 

fdt_checkboard() *is* board-specific code.

There are already various entry points like checkboard() or
> misc_init_r().

But this functions don't normally know where the FDT is.  fdt_checkboard() would be 
designed specifically to validate an FDT from a board-specific point-of-view.  It's good 
to have that code isolated from other board-specific code.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-18  9:09 [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 14:44   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:48     ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:01       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:01         ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:20           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:19             ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 19:04           ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 15:29   ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 15:35     ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:05       ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 16:12         ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:30           ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20  8:36             ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-20  9:33               ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-20 12:39                 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 13:05                 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 15:19                   ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 16:58                     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 17:02                       ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-05-21 17:18                         ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-21 18:31                           ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 19:38                             ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 17:26                         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 19:34                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 19:39                           ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 15:23               ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 17:08                 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 19:16         ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 19:26           ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-18 19:11       ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4651D0B9.9080000@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox