From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:02:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4651D0B9.9080000@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4651CF98.30107@grandegger.com>
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>
>>> Then something similar to the ENV could be chosen:
>>>
>>> CFG_FDT_ADDR
>>> CFG_FDT_IS_IN_FLASH
>>> CFG_FDT_IS_IN_xxx
>>
>> We need two addresses:
>>
>> 1) The address where the FDT is stored when the system is powered up
>
> OK.
>
>> 2) The address in RAM where the FDT should be placed before Linux is
>> booted.
>
> This should be some kind of default address.
Any default address is most likely board-specific. It would be nice if U-Boot could
determine the best address automatically when possible.
> Also be aware, that the
> blob can be within a uImage created with mkimage. Then the load address
> defined in the uImage should be used.
Yes.
> You might be right. The _IS_IN_ is used for the ENV, I have to check
> what the rational behind it is (if there is one at all).
It's handy if you want to use the same macro to represent different types of addresses.
Personally, I don't see much value in that. I would rather that a particular macro be
used to represent only one kind of value. When I see CFG_FDT_ADDR_RAM, I know that the
value is a virtual address that the CPU can dereference at any time.
> I'm not sure if you understand the intended purpose. The address of the
> _initial_ blob could be stored in the env variable "fdtaddr" to select
> _one_ blob out of many in the FLASH.
Hmm....
I can see value in that, but then that variable can contain completely different addresses
depending on the type of storage, which I don't like. Plus, I would rather that we use
macro commands to set the FDT address, rather than an environment variable. This gives us
more flexibility.
> I tend to leave it up to the board specific code where and how to verify
> the FDT.
fdt_checkboard() *is* board-specific code.
There are already various entry points like checkboard() or
> misc_init_r().
But this functions don't normally know where the FDT is. fdt_checkboard() would be
designed specifically to validate an FDT from a board-specific point-of-view. It's good
to have that code isolated from other board-specific code.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 9:09 [U-Boot-Users] Ideas on U-Boot configuration with FDT Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:27 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 14:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 14:48 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 15:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 19:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 15:29 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 15:35 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:05 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-18 16:12 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-18 16:30 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 8:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-20 9:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-20 12:39 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-20 13:05 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 15:19 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 16:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 17:02 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2007-05-21 17:18 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-21 18:31 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 19:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 17:26 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-21 19:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-21 19:39 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 15:23 ` Timur Tabi
2007-05-21 17:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-18 19:16 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-18 19:26 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-18 19:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4651D0B9.9080000@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox