From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Imminent u-boot-fdt pull request
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:31:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46572B6F.3050409@smiths-aerospace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46572826.4090307@freescale.com>
Scott Wood wrote:
> Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>>> What about doing a search for device_type = "cpu", rather than
>>> looking for a specific CPU name? The Linux bootwrapper does it this
>>> way. It also has the benefit of working when there's more than one CPU.
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>
>>
>> I deeply regret the confusion I caused by pushing the "Send" when I
>> meant to push "Write" to start a new, unrelated, message. My updated
>> re-send, as you probably have figured out by now, is more coherent.
>>
>> OF_CPU is defined in the board-specific header file, e.g.
>> configs/MPC8360EMDS.h, pulled in by config.h. Since I am missing the
>> #include <config.h> in the two files being discussed, OF_CPU is
>> undefined and the string concatenation trick makes it silently disappear.
>
> Sure... I was just suggesting a more robust method, that doesn't rely on
> the board config file to define the CPU name.
>
> -Scott
Ah, now I follow. That is worth considering. That would make some
assumptions too, just different ones.
Of the top of my head...
* All CPUs are clocked the same (unlikely to be a problem)
* That the CPU actually _needs_ the fixups (currently they all get the
fixup so it isn't currently a problem)
As long as it works for the bootwrapper, it would work for u-boot. The
two are imperfect subsets of each other, however.
Thanks,
gvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-25 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 4:06 [U-Boot-Users] Imminent u-boot-fdt pull request Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 3:26 ` Kim Phillips
2007-05-25 9:27 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2007-05-25 15:58 ` Kim Phillips
2007-05-25 16:56 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 17:13 ` Kim Phillips
2007-05-25 17:33 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 19:36 ` Kim Phillips
2007-05-25 20:18 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 18:05 ` Scott Wood
2007-05-25 18:12 ` [U-Boot-Users] HUSH local variables visibility in u-boot code Leonid
2007-05-25 19:33 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-25 18:15 ` [U-Boot-Users] Imminent u-boot-fdt pull request Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 18:17 ` Scott Wood
2007-05-25 18:31 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2007-05-25 17:06 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 11:54 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-05-25 15:58 ` Kim Phillips
2007-05-25 16:28 ` Jerry Van Baren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46572B6F.3050409@smiths-aerospace.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox