public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/17] Reorganize and fix problems (returns) in the bootm command.
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:54:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <468CCDD0.2020208@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40707041943x2871c457xc19cd230520bf28f@mail.gmail.com>

Grant Likely wrote:
> On 7/4/07, Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do *NOT* return after the "point of no return" has been passed.
>>   If something goes wrong, the board must be reset after that point.
>> Move the "Transferring control to Linux" debug message back to where it
>>   belongs: just before transferring control to linux.
> 
> Why is it necessary to reset the board at this point?  The failure
> paths here seem to be things like invalid checksums and the like.  Why
> are these tests after a point of no return?
> 
> I would think that if any of these failures are hit, you would *not*
> want to reset the board so you can figure out what was going on.
> 
> Cheers,
> g.

We've smashed our underpinnings by uncompressing linux over our 
interrupt vectors before the checksum catches the problem.  There is no 
way back other than a reset.  The error I fixed (in a couple of places) 
was returns.  FWIIW, my experience with the erroneous returns is that it 
sort of works, but not right and then funky stuff happens. :-/

I presume the comment was a general one.  If you have any specific reset 
vs. return questions, hollar and I'll justify them or eat crow.

Thanks,
gvb

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-05 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-05  1:15 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/17] Reorganize and fix problems (returns) in the bootm command Jerry Van Baren
2007-07-05  2:43 ` Grant Likely
2007-07-05 10:54   ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2007-07-05 14:13     ` Grant Likely
2007-07-05 14:30       ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-07-05 19:36         ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-07-05 15:29     ` Timur Tabi
2007-07-05 15:33       ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-07-05 19:38       ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-07-05 23:46         ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-07-06  2:25         ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=468CCDD0.2020208@gmail.com \
    --to=gvb.uboot@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox