* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/17] New-old set of patches for the u-boot-fdt repository
@ 2007-07-05 1:18 Jerry Van Baren
2007-07-06 0:10 ` [U-Boot-Users] Update on the u-boot-fdt repo status Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2007-07-05 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi all,
I have updated the "fdt" branch of the u-boot-fdt repository with a
reworked set of previously published patches plus a small improvement
(adding a "fdt boardsetup" command).
I am republishing the full set of patches because (a) I did some
reorganization, making it confusing to try to cherry-pick the unchanged
old patches and (b) its been a while since the old set was published.
Best regards,
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] Update on the u-boot-fdt repo status
2007-07-05 1:18 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/17] New-old set of patches for the u-boot-fdt repository Jerry Van Baren
@ 2007-07-06 0:10 ` Jerry Van Baren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2007-07-06 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the "fdt" branch of the u-boot-fdt repository with a
> reworked set of previously published patches plus a small improvement
> (adding a "fdt boardsetup" command).
>
> I am republishing the full set of patches because (a) I did some
> reorganization, making it confusing to try to cherry-pick the unchanged
> old patches and (b) its been a while since the old set was published.
>
> Best regards,
> gvb
A word of warning, I had previously pushed the first pass of these
u-boot-fdt changes to the "master" branch. This was a mistake IMHO, so
I ended up resetting my u-boot-fdt master branch back to before I made
the changes and moved the New Improved[tm] patches into the "fdt" branch.
I ended up having to force a pull from the master u-boot tree on my
"master" branch to recover. I've pushed the resynchronized u-boot-fdt
"master" branch back to denx.de, so I believe everything is clean again.
If you've cloned the u-boot-fdt tree prior to tonight, approximately
23:00 GMT? 2007-07-05, you may have to do a -f force on a git pull or
simply re-clone the u-boot-fdt repo.
My apologies if this causes you grief.
FWIIW, my current best custodian repo technique is:
* Do my work in a different branch than "master" ("fdt" in my case)
* Keep the "master" branch in sync with u-boot-fdt by pulling it.
$ git pull git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot.git
* Rebase my working branch to the "master" to move my changes "after"
the "master" branch (which should alway reflects The Master Repo)
This should allow Wolfgang to pull the branch without having any
merge conflicts because the custodian will have seen and fixed
them already.
$ git rebase master
The proof in the pudding will be when Wolfgang pulls the changes into
The Master Repo...
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-06 0:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-05 1:18 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 0/17] New-old set of patches for the u-boot-fdt repository Jerry Van Baren
2007-07-06 0:10 ` [U-Boot-Users] Update on the u-boot-fdt repo status Jerry Van Baren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox