From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Hammond <sehammond@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] yet another hang after relocate
In-Reply-To: <20070123000829.23940353CDC@atlas.denx.de>
Message-ID: <469379.55009.qm@web32908.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de


Sorry I meant gcc 3.4.6


This is the error I get at the end of building U-Boot
1.1.6:

                -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot
cpu/ppc4xx/resetvec.o(.debug_info+0x14): relocation
truncated to fit: R_PPC_ADDR32 against `.resetvec'+4
make: *** [u-boot] Error 1

I seem to get this regardless of which standard board
I try to build for.  This particular one came from
walnut_config.  1.1.5 didnt have this problem, so I
started using that.

> > Ive added a simple mem test with and without the
> data
> > cache, which works fine either way. Also I copy
> the
> > entire 2MB flash to ram and then verify it back.
> > Again, no problems.
> 
> See the FAQ why this doesn't mean anything.
> 
Yeah I know read-write doesnt mean execute will work,
but at least I know I am copying from flash ok.


> > TEXT_BASE: fffc0000
> > CFG_MONITOR_BASE: ffe00000
> 
> Really? CFG_MONITOR_BASE != TEXT_BASE ? Are you sure
> about this?

Yeah these defines did seem strange to me, thats why I
was dumping them out.  Ill dig into this and see if
that isnt the source of the problem.

thanks,
Scott


--- Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:

> In message
> <802881.16758.qm@web32906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> you
> wrote:
> > 
> > Im using U-Boot 1.1.5 compiled with gcc 2.4.6 and
> make
> > 3.80.
> 
> Why don't you use current U-Boot code your new
> development?
> 
> And what the heck is GCC 2.4.6???
> 
> > and others are in the new 405GPr mode.  They all
> boot
> > and run vxworks just fine, though Im not sure if
> that
> > runs from ram or not.
> 
> See the FAQ.
> 
> > The sdram setup for the 405 is extremely simple,
> just
> > a few registers and delays.  It is identical to
> all
> 
> You still have to get it right.
> 
> > Ive added a simple mem test with and without the
> data
> > cache, which works fine either way. Also I copy
> the
> > entire 2MB flash to ram and then verify it back.
> > Again, no problems.
> 
> See the FAQ why this doesn't mean anything.
> 
> > TEXT_BASE: fffc0000
> > CFG_MONITOR_BASE: ffe00000
> 
> Really? CFG_MONITOR_BASE != TEXT_BASE ? Are you sure
> about this?
> 
> > CFG_ENV_ADDR: ffe3f7f0
> > CFG_ENV_OFFSET: 3f7f0
> 
> Really? Not aligned to a sector boundary? Are you
> sure about this?
> 
> > Top of RAM usable for U-Boot at: 01000000
> > Reserving 1935k for U-Boot at: 00e1c000
> 
> Really? Your U-Boot image needs nearly 2 MB ? Are
> you sure about this?
> 
> > I use a gpio controlled LED to pin point the
> crash,
> > and it is just as it tries to jump to ram.
> 
> ...as expected for a FAQ #1 entry question.
> 
> > I have a feeling the sdram is fine, and either
> 
> Your feeling may be wrong. And your U-Boot is
> misconfigured, too.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> -- 
> Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime
> Systems,  Embedded Linux
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80
> Email: wd at denx.de
> If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port,
> And the bus is interrupted as a very last resort,
> And the address of the memory makes your floppy disk
> abort,
> Then the socket packet pocket has an error to
> report! - Ken Burchill?
>