From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerry Van Baren Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:12:31 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 16/17] mpc83xx: Replace fdt_node_offset() with fdt_find_node_by_path(). In-Reply-To: <20070711194645.e8535a6b.kim.phillips@freescale.com> References: <20070705012730.GQ21474@cideas.com> <20070711194645.e8535a6b.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Message-ID: <46957FFF.4040508@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Kim Phillips wrote: [snip] > Hi gvb, > > there were a couple of minor issues I fixed up in patches 16 & 17: > > o stale CONFIG_MPC83XX_TSECx cruft > > o unnecessary OF_TBCLK ifdefs (all applicable boards define it, and > linux' calibration loop doesn't exit without it) > > o mutual exclusion with CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE > > o minor whitespace inconsistencies > > I decided to save time and fix them in place. I applied them to the > mpc83xx branch on u-boot-mpc83xx.git. Excellent! > The master branch of u-boot-mpc83xx.git still reflects WD's master. > Since the mpc83xx branch doesn't compile for the 8360, and since > everyone should be on u-boot-testing anyway, I merged u-boot-testing, > u-boot-fdt (minus 16 & 17), and the mpc83xx branch into the testing > branch of u-boot-mpc83xx.git. > > Functionality is looking good, esp. thanks to your fixups, gvb, thanks. > > So, 83xx users, please test u-boot-mpc83xx.git#testing. > > Thanks, > > Kim Even better! I was just debating how adventurous I would be tonight, whether I should try applying Jon's patchzilla on u-boot-fdt. You just did it for me. Even better. ;-) Thanks again, gvb