From: Jerry Van Baren <vanbaren@cideas.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Updated u-boot-fdt with Kim's patch revisions
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:32:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469827C7.2090206@cideas.com> (raw)
Hi All,
I've removed my versions of the two 83xx patches and replaced them with
Kim's improved versions (cleaned up the TSEC areas, some whitespace fixes):
"mpc83xx: Fix errors when CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT is enabled"
"mpc83xx: Replace fdt_node_offset() with fdt_find_node_by_path()."
Kim, others:
Any thoughts on the "goodness" of the cumulative set of patches?
1) Are they ready to be pulled by Wolfgang?
2) How should we push them uphill? Via the u-boot-83xx repo or
u-boot-fdt?
Best regards,
gvb
reply other threads:[~2007-07-14 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469827C7.2090206@cideas.com \
--to=vanbaren@cideas.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox