From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:34:03 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] uboot custodian question In-Reply-To: References: <002701c7d413$ea309cb0$821ba8c0@Emea.Arm.com> <46B1449A.400@gmail.com> Message-ID: <46B1C12B.10202@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Ksi, ksi at koi8.net stated on 8/1/2007 11:39 PM: > What work? It's been 3 months since I've submitted patches for fully > working > U-Boot on TMS320DM6446 platform. I do already have some patches to those > patches. We do run it for something like 6 months on various boards. What > work are you talking about, man? > > I'm really really angry, nobody seems to care... What else should I do to > get the _PERFECTLY WORKING_ port into the main tree? What's the problem? My apologies on not following up mails in the uboot list.. I was not aware of your work.. but I do know that OMAP24xx and OMAP34xx patches need a lot of rework.. I could be wrong to imagine that these could share some files with Davinci and viceversa... I can see the patch here in the ARM queue: http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/PatchStatus (posted on 2007-05-08) maybe Peter can comment on his plans of merger.. Regards, Nishanth Menon