From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] fdt in u-boot
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 08:34:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C1A150.4030807@smiths-aerospace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6DA37928-5D2E-4C55-96E8-D3BFE74F120F@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I was wondering if you wouldn't mind summarizing the state of the
> fdt/libfdt work. I haven't been following what's been going on here in
> u-boot.
>
> thanks
>
> - k
Hi Kumar,
I try to keep the wiki page up to date, I've updated it in response to
your query:
<http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/UBootFdtInfo>
(it is linked off the Custodian page:)
<http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/Custodians>
LIBFDT is in good shape in general, quite usable (send patches if I
lie...). The #1 outstanding task as I see it is to convert the board-,
CPU-, and PCI-specific ft_*() fdt initialization/update routines over to
to use libfdt. Patches for these improvements would go to the
appropriate 8Yxx maintainer's repositories {Kim|Andy|Jon}.
Outstanding Patches:
--------------------
* Andy Fleming's patch WRT making sure the blob is in the lower
portion (16GB at the moment) of memory. Discussion has been resolved,
it will be applied and a pull request will go out tonight (Wolfgang's
tomorrow ;-).
* Unpublished patch of JerryVanBaren, implementing a suggestion by
Scott Wood to make the /chosen handling finer grained: if the /chosen
node exists, currently u-boot-fdt bails out. A better methodology is to
not overwrite pre-existing properties on a per-property basis, so if
/chosen exists but a necessary /chosen/property doesn't, it gets
created. Good idea, but not published and poorly tested at the moment.
CPU sub-architectures:
----------------------
See the table(and update or send me updates):
<http://www.denx.de/wiki/UBoot/UBootFdtInfo#AdoptionTable>
83xx: mpc8360emds is converted (my eval board). Kim has done work on
834x board(s) but I'm not sure which ones have been converted off-hand.
86xx: Jon has said he has a note on his whiteboard to convert the 86xx
over to using LIBFDT.
85xx: Unknown. Andy is the maintainer and has submitted patch(es) so
there obviously is some activity there.
Best regards,
gvb
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-14 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6DA37928-5D2E-4C55-96E8-D3BFE74F120F@kernel.crashing.org>
2007-08-14 12:34 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2007-08-14 16:14 ` [U-Boot-Users] fdt in u-boot Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C1A150.4030807@smiths-aerospace.com \
--to=gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox