From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@smiths-aerospace.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:11:51 -0400
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] bootm/fdt: Only process the fdt if an
 fdt address was provided
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40709052033l6ed496e0s879569ef73f47a23@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20070830235905.29764.63416.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net>	<20070905155359.08dbb66e.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
	<fa686aa40709052033l6ed496e0s879569ef73f47a23@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <46DFEE87.6080005@smiths-aerospace.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Grant Likely wrote:
> On 9/5/07, Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:59:05 -0600
>> Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>>>
>>> Boards with CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT enabled are not able to boot old-style
>>> kernels using the board info structure (instead of passing a device tree)
>>> This change allows the old style booting to be used if the fdt argument
>>> was not passed to 'bootm'.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>>>
>> Thanks Grant,
>>
>> Acked-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
> 
> Who's tree should this getting pushed through?  I'm getting ready to
> push the 5xxx libfdt fixup; shall I include it in my tree (even though
> it's not strictly a 5xxx change).
> 
> Cheers,
> g.

U-boot-testing or, since it fixes an apparent bug, direct to the main 
repo would be my advice (through Wolfgang in either case).

Best regards,
gvb