From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shinya Kuribayashi Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:31:47 +0900 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC] u-boot migration to kconfig In-Reply-To: <1190585597.7015.28.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> References: <20070923213756.63C242405D@gemini.denx.de> <1190585597.7015.28.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> Message-ID: <46F72FA3.8090906@ruby.dti.ne.jp> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > It would be more useful to collect all boards > using one specific chip in a single directory. > arch/arm//board. This is too tight, isn't it? Strictly speaking, boards are not related to chips (at least for me). So I'll vote +1 for Jean's. >>> arch/arm/boot <- where will be store the u-boot & u-boot.bin >> I don't see a use for this. What's wroing with having these files in >> the top level directory? > > If you could build several boards in one tree, then > it makes sense to have it in a subdirectory, > but for once I agree with Wolfgang :-) I agree with Wolfgang, too. Thanks, Shinya Kuribayashi