[U-Boot-Users] [RFC] u-boot migration to kconfig

Ulf Samuelsson
2007-09-24T08:15:33Z

s?n 2007-09-23 klockan 23:12 -0600 skrev Grant Likely:
> On 9/23/07, Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > > It would be more useful to collect all boards
> > > using one specific chip in a single directory.
> > > arch/arm/<chip>/board.
> >
> > This is too tight, isn't it?
> > Strictly speaking, boards are not related to chips (at least for me).
> > So I'll vote +1 for Jean's.
>
> Just to throw a wrench in the works, what about boards like the Xilinx
> ML403 which can be *either* PowerPC or MicroBlaze. :-)
>

There won't be many of those boards,and I am sure that
the community will find the right way to handle exceptions.

> I still think sticking with the existing board/ directory (but perhaps
> organizing it better) makes the most sense. Each board directory can
> pull in whatever cpu/soc support it needs.
>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
BR
Ulf Samuelsson