* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND update 2
@ 2007-12-21 9:15 William Juul
2008-01-04 14:21 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Juul @ 2007-12-21 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Make nand dump and nand dump.oob work again.
This is a small update to the patch series I sent earlier
and must be applied on top of those patches.
Signed-off-by: William Juul <william.juul@tandberg.com>
Signed-off-by: Stig Olsen <stig.olsen@tandberg.com>
----
Have anyone tried/looked at the patch series?
On our git server http://git.tandberg.com/tandberg/u-boot.git, I have
updated the branch mtd-update to be based on v1.3.1 and I have also
made a mtd-update-1.3.1 branch. These two branches now contain the patch
included in this email.
I have also put an updated patch on our git http server:
http://git.tandberg.com/tandberg/patches/mtd-update.patch
This patch is a diff between my mtd-update-1.3.1 branch and v1.3.1 tag.
Best regards
William
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
index bb1accd..a3ea1db 100644
--- a/common/cmd_nand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
@@ -40,37 +40,44 @@ int find_dev_and_part(const char *id, struct mtd_device **dev,
extern nand_info_t nand_info[]; /* info for NAND chips */
-static int nand_dump_oob(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off)
+static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int only_oob)
{
int i;
- u_char *buf, *p;
+ u_char *datbuf, *oobbuf, *p;
- buf = malloc(nand->writesize + nand->oobsize);
- if (!buf) {
+ datbuf = malloc(nand->writesize + nand->oobsize);
+ oobbuf = malloc(nand->oobsize);
+ if (!datbuf || !oobbuf) {
puts("No memory for page buffer\n");
return 1;
}
off &= ~(nand->writesize - 1);
size_t dummy;
loff_t addr = (loff_t) off;
- i = nand->read(nand, addr, nand->writesize, &dummy, buf);
+ struct mtd_oob_ops ops;
+ memset(&ops, 0, sizeof(ops));
+ ops.datbuf = datbuf;
+ ops.oobbuf = oobbuf; /* must exist, but oob data will be appended to ops.datbuf */
+ ops.len = nand->writesize;
+ ops.ooblen = nand->oobsize;
+ ops.mode = MTD_OOB_RAW;
+ i = nand->read_oob(nand, addr, &ops);
if (i < 0) {
printf("Error (%d) reading page %08x\n", i, off);
- free(buf);
+ free(datbuf);
+ free(oobbuf);
return 1;
}
printf("Page %08x dump:\n", off);
- i = nand->writesize >> 4; p = buf;
+ i = nand->writesize >> 4;
+ p = datbuf;
while (i--) {
- printf( "\t%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x"
- " %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x\n",
- p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], p[6], p[7],
- p[8], p[9], p[10], p[11], p[12], p[13], p[14], p[15]);
+ if (!only_oob) {
+ printf( "\t%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x"
+ " %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x\n",
+ p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], p[6], p[7],
+ p[8], p[9], p[10], p[11], p[12], p[13], p[14], p[15]);
+ }
p += 16;
}
puts("OOB:\n");
@@ -80,7 +87,8 @@ static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off)
p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], p[6], p[7]);
p += 8;
}
- free(buf);
+ free(datbuf);
+ free(oobbuf);
return 0;
}
@@ -304,9 +312,9 @@ int do_nand(cmd_tbl_t * cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
off = (int)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
if (s != NULL && strcmp(s, ".oob") == 0)
- ret = nand_dump_oob(nand, off);
+ ret = nand_dump(nand, off, 1);
else
- ret = nand_dump(nand, off);
+ ret = nand_dump(nand, off, 0);
return ret == 0 ? 1 : 0;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND update 2
2007-12-21 9:15 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND update 2 William Juul
@ 2008-01-04 14:21 ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-04 14:40 ` William Juul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-01-04 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi William,
On Friday 21 December 2007, William Juul wrote:
> Make nand dump and nand dump.oob work again.
>
> This is a small update to the patch series I sent earlier
> and must be applied on top of those patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Juul <william.juul@tandberg.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stig Olsen <stig.olsen@tandberg.com>
> ----
>
> Have anyone tried/looked at the patch series?
>
> On our git server http://git.tandberg.com/tandberg/u-boot.git, I have
> updated the branch mtd-update to be based on v1.3.1 and I have also
> made a mtd-update-1.3.1 branch. These two branches now contain the patch
> included in this email.
I'm trying to integrate your patches right now. Looks quite good so far but
I'm facing some problems on a ppc4xx board with a large page NAND chip. Small
page devices are fine.
Did you ever test this stuff on large page devices? Which ones?
BTW: What is the platform you "normally" test on (ARM, MIPS, PPC...)?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND update 2
2008-01-04 14:21 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2008-01-04 14:40 ` William Juul
2008-01-04 16:16 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Juul @ 2008-01-04 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Jan 4, 2008 3:21 PM, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On Friday 21 December 2007, William Juul wrote:
> > Make nand dump and nand dump.oob work again.
> >
> > This is a small update to the patch series I sent earlier
> > and must be applied on top of those patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: William Juul <william.juul@tandberg.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stig Olsen <stig.olsen@tandberg.com>
> > ----
> >
> > Have anyone tried/looked at the patch series?
> >
> > On our git server http://git.tandberg.com/tandberg/u-boot.git, I have
> > updated the branch mtd-update to be based on v1.3.1 and I have also
> > made a mtd-update-1.3.1 branch. These two branches now contain the patch
> > included in this email.
>
> I'm trying to integrate your patches right now. Looks quite good so far but
> I'm facing some problems on a ppc4xx board with a large page NAND chip. Small
> page devices are fine.
>
> Did you ever test this stuff on large page devices? Which ones?
We did run this on large page devices with 4KB page size (total size
of 1/2 GB). Unfortunately the devices are/were under NDA as they
are/were not officially released yet.
Stig can you verify if any/both of the flashes can be named here?
>
> BTW: What is the platform you "normally" test on (ARM, MIPS, PPC...)?
We had two custom boards, one ARM based (926) and one PPC83xx.
I will not have access to the build environment and boards the next
couple of months, but Stig Olsen is more than capable of answering
questions (if he has the time :-)
Best regards
William
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
>
> =====================================================================
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
> =====================================================================
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND update 2
2008-01-04 14:40 ` William Juul
@ 2008-01-04 16:16 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2008-01-04 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Friday 04 January 2008, William Juul wrote:
> > I'm trying to integrate your patches right now. Looks quite good so far
> > but I'm facing some problems on a ppc4xx board with a large page NAND
> > chip. Small page devices are fine.
> >
> > Did you ever test this stuff on large page devices? Which ones?
>
> We did run this on large page devices with 4KB page size (total size
> of 1/2 GB). Unfortunately the devices are/were under NDA as they
> are/were not officially released yet.
> Stig can you verify if any/both of the flashes can be named here?
Not needed anymore. I found my problem. A timeout was calculated incorrectly.
I need to change nand_base.c at one place to make it work on my platform with
my NAND chips. I'll post a till beginning of next week, so that you (or Stig)
can test it on your platform too.
> > BTW: What is the platform you "normally" test on (ARM, MIPS, PPC...)?
>
> We had two custom boards, one ARM based (926) and one PPC83xx.
>
> I will not have access to the build environment and boards the next
> couple of months, but Stig Olsen is more than capable of answering
> questions (if he has the time :-)
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-04 16:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-21 9:15 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] NAND update 2 William Juul
2008-01-04 14:21 ` Stefan Roese
2008-01-04 14:40 ` William Juul
2008-01-04 16:16 ` Stefan Roese
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox