From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Warren Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:59:00 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request: u-boot-freebsd In-Reply-To: <4773E10D.3040007@semihalf.com> References: <20071227170627.127F9248EF@gemini.denx.de> <4773E10D.3040007@semihalf.com> Message-ID: <47740404.4090601@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > you wrote: > >>>> This adds a lot of code to the networking code which is not neede dby >>>> most of the boards. Please make this an optional feature that get's >>>> only compiled in for boards that explicitely request it. Then run this >>>> patch separately through the network custodian. >>>> >>> I already sent this patch to Ben and the list some time ago and got an initial >>> ACK, but I'll re-spin with. >>> >> Even is Ben ACKed this patch, it should go through *his* repository, >> not your's (which is supposed to contain FreeBSD related changes >> only). >> >> > > Yes, I know what you mean, although it's not always that sharp in case of > cross-functional areas changes. Also, assuming such purely orthogonal > development model may bring unnecessary burden and delays when a greater > number of areas (and custodians) is involved: individual changes need to be > processed by responsible custodians, merging should happen in order and so on. > Just my thoughts :) But I can wait for Ben, no problem. > Yeah, I don't know which is the best way to handle this case, and you're right that it's certainly not unique. I can either take the one patch, or you can add my signed-off-by. As grand poo-bah, maybe Wolfgang can set policy here... regards, Ben