* [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check
@ 2008-01-04 22:01 Dan Batryn
2008-01-06 4:40 ` Ben Warren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dan Batryn @ 2008-01-04 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Due to a mis-configuration of our DHCP server there was an overlapping range of DHCP assigned IP address and units configured to have IP addresses statically assigned. I was surprised to find that UBOOT did not complain of a duplicate IP address while trying to boot via the network. Looking through the source I cannot see any code to perform the typical ARP for yourself check that I have seen before. Could someone please tell me if I have overlooked something or is this feature missing?
Daniel Batryn
Shoretel Inc.
960 Stewart
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Phone: (408) 331-3575
Fax: (408) 331-3333
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check
2008-01-04 22:01 [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check Dan Batryn
@ 2008-01-06 4:40 ` Ben Warren
2008-01-06 11:52 ` gvb.uboot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Warren @ 2008-01-06 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Dan,
Dan Batryn wrote:
> Due to a mis-configuration of our DHCP server there was an overlapping range of DHCP assigned IP address and units configured to have IP addresses statically assigned. I was surprised to find that UBOOT did not complain of a duplicate IP address while trying to boot via the network. Looking through the source I cannot see any code to perform the typical ARP for yourself check that I have seen before. Could someone please tell me if I have overlooked something or is this feature missing?
>
>
There is no explicit check for duplicate IP assignment. U-boot's
networking code is intentionally minimalist and thus lacks many such
features. Feel free to provide a patch and a convincing argument of why
it's needed.
regards,
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check
2008-01-06 4:40 ` Ben Warren
@ 2008-01-06 11:52 ` gvb.uboot
2008-01-06 21:30 ` Ben Warren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: gvb.uboot @ 2008-01-06 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Ben Warren wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Batryn wrote:
>> Due to a mis-configuration of our DHCP server there was an
>> overlapping range of DHCP assigned IP address and units configured
>> to have IP addresses statically assigned. I was surprised to find
>> that UBOOT did not complain of a duplicate IP address while trying
>> to boot via the network. Looking through the source I cannot see
>> any code to perform the typical ARP for yourself check that I have
>> seen before. Could someone please tell me if I have overlooked
>> something or is this feature missing?
>>
>>
> There is no explicit check for duplicate IP assignment. U-boot's
> networking code is intentionally minimalist and thus lacks many such
> features. Feel free to provide a patch and a convincing argument of why
> it's needed.
>
> regards,
> Ben
Ditto on the patch.
WRT the convincing argument, I think the bar would be *really* low on
this one. :-) I would consider a convincing argument to be "The nearly
universal convention of performing an ARP to verify that the
DHCP-assigned IP address is unused is missing."
Best regards,
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check
2008-01-06 11:52 ` gvb.uboot
@ 2008-01-06 21:30 ` Ben Warren
2008-01-07 0:09 ` gvb.uboot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ben Warren @ 2008-01-06 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
gvb.uboot wrote:
> Ben Warren wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Dan Batryn wrote:
>>> Due to a mis-configuration of our DHCP server there was an
>>> overlapping range of DHCP assigned IP address and units configured
>>> to have IP addresses statically assigned. I was surprised to find
>>> that UBOOT did not complain of a duplicate IP address while trying
>>> to boot via the network. Looking through the source I cannot see
>>> any code to perform the typical ARP for yourself check that I have
>>> seen before. Could someone please tell me if I have overlooked
>>> something or is this feature missing?
>>>
>> There is no explicit check for duplicate IP assignment. U-boot's
>> networking code is intentionally minimalist and thus lacks many such
>> features. Feel free to provide a patch and a convincing argument of
>> why it's needed.
>>
>> regards,
>> Ben
>
> Ditto on the patch.
>
> WRT the convincing argument, I think the bar would be *really* low on
> this one. :-) I would consider a convincing argument to be "The nearly
> universal convention of performing an ARP to verify that the
> DHCP-assigned IP address is unused is missing."
Sure, this is a no-brainer. But, it shouldn't be limited to DHCP since
having a dynamic address trouncing a static one is only one trouble
scenario. Who knows, there may be people out there who object to the
extra milliseconds that this ARP will add to boot time (not me).
regards,
Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check
2008-01-06 21:30 ` Ben Warren
@ 2008-01-07 0:09 ` gvb.uboot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gvb.uboot @ 2008-01-07 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Ben Warren wrote:
> gvb.uboot wrote:
>> Ben Warren wrote:
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> Dan Batryn wrote:
>>>> Due to a mis-configuration of our DHCP server there was an
>>>> overlapping range of DHCP assigned IP address and units configured
>>>> to have IP addresses statically assigned. I was surprised to find
>>>> that UBOOT did not complain of a duplicate IP address while trying
>>>> to boot via the network. Looking through the source I cannot see
>>>> any code to perform the typical ARP for yourself check that I have
>>>> seen before. Could someone please tell me if I have overlooked
>>>> something or is this feature missing?
>>>>
>>> There is no explicit check for duplicate IP assignment. U-boot's
>>> networking code is intentionally minimalist and thus lacks many such
>>> features. Feel free to provide a patch and a convincing argument of
>>> why it's needed.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Ben
>>
>> Ditto on the patch.
>>
>> WRT the convincing argument, I think the bar would be *really* low on
>> this one. :-) I would consider a convincing argument to be "The nearly
>> universal convention of performing an ARP to verify that the
>> DHCP-assigned IP address is unused is missing."
> Sure, this is a no-brainer. But, it shouldn't be limited to DHCP since
> having a dynamic address trouncing a static one is only one trouble
> scenario. Who knows, there may be people out there who object to the
> extra milliseconds that this ARP will add to boot time (not me).
>
> regards,
> Ben
Ahh, so right. It is actually a worse risk for human-assigned
addresses. s/DHCP-//
It would be simple enough to have a configurable ARP response wait
timeout and use a special value (say <= 0) to disable the ARP test.
gvb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-07 0:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-04 22:01 [U-Boot-Users] Duplicate IP address check Dan Batryn
2008-01-06 4:40 ` Ben Warren
2008-01-06 11:52 ` gvb.uboot
2008-01-06 21:30 ` Ben Warren
2008-01-07 0:09 ` gvb.uboot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox