From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bartlomiej Sieka <tur@semihalf.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:05:25 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] RFC: new bootm syntax
In-Reply-To: <20080108145205.9D60F6F002A@nyx.denx.de>
References: <20080108145205.9D60F6F002A@nyx.denx.de>
Message-ID: <47839F45.2090106@semihalf.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
[...]
>>> Note: the officially documented method to start a standalone program 
>>> is "go".
>> Well, there's quite a bit of support for standalone applications outside
>> of the "go" command. For example current image format has provisions for
> 
> I know, but as mentioned above, this is not really documented (which
> means a deficiency on the decoumentation).
> 
>> it; from include/image.h:
>> dress of new uImage D new
>>  >> uImage sub-image specification E new uImag
>> /*
>> * Image Types
>> *
>> * "Standalone Programs" are directly runnable in the environment
>> * provided by U-Boot; it is expected that (if they behave
>> * well) you can continue to work in U-Boot after return from
>> * the Standalone Program.
> 
> I guess there was a problem with what you intended to quote?

Yes, sorry. I meant:

"
Well, there's quite a bit of support for standalone applications outside
of the "go" command. For example current image format has provisions for
it; from include/image.h:

/*
* Image Types
*
* "Standalone Programs" are directly runnable in the environment
* provided by U-Boot; it is expected that (if they behave
* well) you can continue to work in U-Boot after return from
* the Standalone Program.
"

Regards,
Bartlomiej