From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marian Balakowicz <m8@semihalf.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:21:21 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/13] [new uImage] Cleanup
 OF/FDT	#if/#elif/#endif use in	do_bootm_linux()
In-Reply-To: <4787989B.9050904@ge.com>
References: <20080111142744.8025.82931.stgit@hekate.izotz.org>
	<20080111142857.8025.9424.stgit@hekate.izotz.org>
	<4787989B.9050904@ge.com>
Message-ID: <478C8921.8090208@semihalf.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Marian Balakowicz wrote:
>> Make CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT and CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE use more
>> readable in PPC variant of do_bootm_linux() routine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marian Balakowicz <m8@semihalf.com>
> 
> What is the wisdom of the crowd, is it possible to port over the
> remaining 5 boards and removing the "CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE" code in this
> merge window, or is it too risky?  My gut says too risky, do it in the
> next window.
[snip]

I'd be more then happy to removed CONFIG_OF_FLAT_TREE from image/bootm
related code. It'll simplify the current code and will allow to avoid
unnecessary hassle when adding new functionality.

How about I do such cleanup in the next patchset? It will not hit
mainline  before the next window and it seems we should be done with
converting remaining boards by then. Does that sound reasonable?

Cheers,
m.