From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:48:25 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in
 cfi_flash.c
In-Reply-To: <200802041113.49729.sr@denx.de>
References: <200801282227.06426.vapier@gentoo.org>	<200801291413.38460.sr@denx.de>	<47A5E42B.2060100@discworld.dascon.de>
	<200802041113.49729.sr@denx.de>
Message-ID: <47A733C9.3030207@discworld.dascon.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Stefan Roese wrote:
>> However, I wonder if it would be possible to simply issue *both* reset
>> commands - if the flash safely ignores the second (unknown) command,
>> this should be fine, but it is relying on undocumented behaviour.
>>     
>
> Good idea. Do you (or somebody else) have HW available to test such a change?
>   
I think I can run tests on a small set (~5-10 different AMD-commandset 
and 2 intel-commandset, all 16 bit) flashs, but that still leaves the 
(small) possibility that there are flash roms that behave different.

cu
Michael