From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:45:56 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [patch] do not use cmd_reset uninitialized in
 cfi_flash.c
In-Reply-To: <200802041705.10934.sr@denx.de>
References: <200801282227.06426.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<200802041113.49729.sr@denx.de>
	<47A733C9.3030207@discworld.dascon.de>
	<200802041705.10934.sr@denx.de>
Message-ID: <47A83054.6020004@discworld.dascon.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Stefan Roese wrote:
>> I think I can run tests on a small set (~5-10 different AMD-commandset
>> and 2 intel-commandset, all 16 bit) flashs, but that still leaves the
>> (small) possibility that there are flash roms that behave different.
>>     
>
> Right. But it will be an improvement to the current implementation, where a 
> random command is written as RESET command. And also an improvement to the 
> fixed AMD/Intel RESET command. So I vote for trying this solution. I'll test 
> on a few of mine platforms too.
>
> Michael, could please you provide a patch?
>   
Yes, but it may take some days - I probably need to run the tests on a 
board that has socketed flash, using a special test case that really 
puts the flash in the middle of a command cycle and tests reset behaviour.

cu
Michael