From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rafal Jaworowski Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:11:30 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] ARM AT91 Ethernet address register In-Reply-To: <47B18862.4070001@semihalf.com> References: <47B18862.4070001@semihalf.com> Message-ID: <47B421E2.7070900@semihalf.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > What is the reason the MAC address on the AT91 is written in the 2nd address > register, leaving the first one out? Is there something particular about this? > > See cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c, eth_init() > ... > p_mac->EMAC_SA2L = ... > ... > > The reason I ask is this may confuse OS driver if no MAC address is found in > the first register (which is the case for FreeBSD/ARM, for example). > Hello Rick, Perhaps you could shed some light on the above? kind regards, Rafal