public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerry Van Baren <gerald.vanbaren@ge.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] [new uImage] ppc: Re-order ramdisk/fdt handling sequence
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:46:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B9E092.608@ge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CE9AA776-F91D-45A1-9A8F-40A3F8CC1509@kernel.crashing.org>

Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> 
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
>>>> Kumar Gala wrote:

[[[[snip]]]]

>> The patch is creating dummy initrd entries in the reserved map and in 
>> /chosen, only to work hard to delete and re-create the reserved map 
>> entries and rewrite the /chosen entries.
>>
>> My counter-proposal is to not bother with dummy values.  Simply pass 
>> in 0,0 which will prevent the creation of the initrd entries by 
>> fdt_chosen().  By not creating dummy entries, you can simply create 
>> the proper entries once you know what the the correct values are, 
>> rather than the more complicated rsvmap search & delete + rsvmap 
>> creation + /chosen modifications.
> 
> Ahh, the reason I wanted them created was to ensure we have enough size 
> for them up front rather than figuring that out later.  By creating them 
> and replacing them I will not being changing the size at all.
> 
> - k

OK, I see.

Currently this isn't an issue because our blob has a fixed size that has 
free space inside it, so creating the rsvmap and /chosen entries eat at 
the internal free space and don't change the total blob size.

People are advocating dynamically increasing the blob size, which 
simplifies things for blob generation (don't have to guess how big to 
make the blob when running the dtc to create it), but that would cause 
problems with my counter-proposal.

Thanks,
gvb

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-18 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-18 17:27 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] [new uImage] ppc: Re-order ramdisk/fdt handling sequence Kumar Gala
2008-02-18 17:51 ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-02-18 18:52   ` Kumar Gala
2008-02-18 19:15     ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-02-18 19:39       ` Kumar Gala
2008-02-18 19:46         ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
2008-02-18 20:13           ` Kumar Gala
2008-02-22 11:43             ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-02-22 13:27               ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-02-22 14:36                 ` Bartlomiej Sieka
2008-02-26  5:48                   ` Kumar Gala
2008-02-22 15:32             ` Marian Balakowicz
2008-02-22 15:53               ` Marian Balakowicz
2008-02-22 16:07               ` Jerry Van Baren
2008-02-22 17:08                 ` Marian Balakowicz
2008-02-26  5:52                   ` Kumar Gala
2008-02-26  9:11                     ` Marian Balakowicz
2008-02-26 14:31                       ` Kumar Gala
2008-02-27 11:20                         ` Marian Balakowicz
2008-02-27 14:58                           ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47B9E092.608@ge.com \
    --to=gerald.vanbaren@ge.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox